Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Łukowska-kadun uudelleenrakentaminen Lyskissä yhdessä sanitaarviemäröintijärjestelmän remontin kanssa

Avoin
Määräaika
1 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 17, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
2026/BZP 00175035/01
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Śląskie, Puola
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 09, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 27, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 10, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 17, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Śląskie
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€12,641,706
Keskim. tarjoukset
0.1
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
86%
133,693 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Łukowska-kadun uudelleenrakentaminen Lyskissä yhdessä sanitaarviemäröintijärjestelmän remontin kanssa

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for road and sewage renovation in Lyski presents a solid opportunity for experienced civil engineering firms. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements necessitates a proactive approach, focusing on demonstrating technical competence, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to best practices. Leveraging the 'equivalent solutions' clause and highlighting project management efficiency will be key differentiators.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Delivering a high-quality, durable road and sewage infrastructure for Gmina Lyski through efficient project execution and cost-effective solutions.

Minimizing disruption to local residents and businesses through proactive traffic management and timely completion.

Providing value through technically sound and equivalent material solutions that meet or exceed specified quality standards.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
The 'equivalent solutions' clause allows for potential cost savings and competitive pricing by sourcing materials that meet or exceed specified parameters but may be more cost-effective.
The absence of a specified duration for the contract allows flexibility in proposing an efficient and expedited timeline, potentially appealing to the Contracting Authority.
The CPV codes indicate a focus on core civil engineering works, allowing bidders to leverage their established expertise and existing resources.
The estimated value not being disclosed suggests the Contracting Authority may be open to competitive pricing, making cost a significant factor in the evaluation.
Keskeiset haasteet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid to maximize scoring. The absence of mandatory requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) is also unusual and requires careful interpretation.

Assume a standard evaluation process heavily weighted towards price and technical merit. Proactively address all potential requirements based on standard public procurement practices and the project description. Focus on a clear, well-structured technical proposal and a competitive price.

The tender documents are minimal, requiring bidders to infer certain requirements and best practices.

Conduct thorough due diligence. Request clarifications from the Contracting Authority regarding any ambiguities. Base the bid on industry best practices and common requirements for similar public works contracts in Poland.

The absence of 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects' requirements means these cannot be leveraged as direct differentiators, but should still be considered for good practice.

While not explicitly required, incorporating sustainable practices and responsible labor practices into the bid can still enhance the bidder's reputation and demonstrate a commitment to quality and corporate responsibility, which can indirectly influence perception.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A civil engineering company with a proven track record in municipal infrastructure projects, specifically road construction and sanitary sewage system repairs. The ideal bidder will have strong project management capabilities, efficient supply chain management for construction materials, and a skilled workforce capable of delivering high-quality work within budget and on schedule. Experience with Polish public procurement regulations and a robust understanding of local building standards are essential.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Detailed technical proposal for road and sewage renovation, including materials and methodology.
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds (though not specified, assumed standard).
Demonstration of financial stability and capacity to undertake the project.
Proposal for temporary traffic management during works.
Understanding and application of 'equivalent solutions' for specified materials and equipment.
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated ability to offer technically equivalent or superior materials at a competitive price, leveraging the 'equivalent solutions' clause.
A highly efficient and well-articulated project management plan that emphasizes minimal disruption and timely completion.
A clear and concise technical proposal that goes beyond the minimum requirements, showcasing innovation in execution or problem-solving, even if not explicitly requested.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not mandated, consider including a commitment to local employment where feasible, or a plan for waste reduction and recycling during construction, to demonstrate responsible corporate citizenship.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Price

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy by optimizing material sourcing (leveraging equivalent solutions) and efficient labor deployment. Ensure all costs are accurately accounted for, including potential unforeseen issues.

Technical Merit

Provide a detailed, clear, and technically sound proposal that addresses all aspects of the road and sewage renovation. Emphasize the quality of proposed materials (even if equivalent) and the robustness of the construction methodology. Include a comprehensive plan for temporary traffic management.

Project Management

Present a strong project management approach, highlighting experience in similar projects, clear communication channels, and a proactive risk management strategy. Focus on efficiency and minimizing impact on the local community.

Suositukset6
Thoroughly Analyze and Interpret 'Equivalent Solutions'
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Scrutinize the technical documentation for any specified materials or equipment. Identify opportunities to propose high-quality, cost-effective equivalent alternatives that meet or exceed the stated parameters. Document the justification for each equivalent solution clearly.

Significant cost reduction and enhanced competitiveness.
Develop a Competitive Pricing Strategy
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria and estimated value, assume price will be a major factor. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown and identify areas for efficiency to offer a compelling price without compromising quality.

Increased likelihood of winning based on cost.
Request Clarifications on Missing Requirements
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Proactively seek clarification from Gmina Lyski regarding any ambiguities in the tender documents, particularly concerning eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, as well as the evaluation criteria. This demonstrates engagement and helps avoid misinterpretations.

Reduced risk of bid disqualification and improved bid quality.
Emphasize Project Management and Minimal Disruption
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Detail a robust project management plan that prioritizes efficient execution, clear communication with the Contracting Authority and local stakeholders, and a comprehensive strategy for minimizing traffic disruption and inconvenience to residents during the works.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver smoothly and professionally.
Prepare a Comprehensive Technical Proposal
KeskitasoKorkea vaiva

Even without explicit technical evaluation criteria, a detailed and well-structured technical proposal is crucial. It should clearly outline the methodology, materials (including justifications for equivalents), equipment, and quality control measures. This demonstrates competence and foresight.

Strengthens the bid's credibility and technical merit.
Incorporate Best Practices for Sustainability
MatalaMatala vaiva

While not mandated, subtly integrate elements of sustainable construction, such as waste management and efficient material use, into the technical proposal. This aligns with modern construction standards and can be a positive, albeit indirect, factor.

Enhances bidder reputation and aligns with broader industry trends.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as offering the best value for money, combining competitive pricing with a technically sound and efficient execution plan. Highlight the advantage of using equivalent solutions to achieve cost savings without compromising quality.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

5 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (1)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Notice PDFPDF
08de8bf1-4d98-ef6a-5fad-950001e71e6f.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the reconstruction of Łukowska Street in Łyski, including sanitary sewage system repairs.

Plan sytuacyjny - Przebudowa ¥ukowskiej wraz z remontem kan sanit.pdfPDF
Plan sytuacyjny - Przebudowa ¥ukowskiej wraz ... -- 306.2 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Przedmiar - Przebudowa ¥ukowskiej wraz z remontem kan sanit.ATHDOC
Przedmiar - Przebudowa ¥ukowskiej wraz z remo... -- 20.7 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Przedmiar - Przebudowa ¥ukowskiej wraz z remontem kan sanit.pdfPDF
Przedmiar - Przebudowa ¥ukowskiej wraz z remo... -- 87.6 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdfPDF
Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the reconstruction of Łukowska Street in Łyski, including the renovation of the sanitary sewage system.

SWZ_ZP.271.2.2026.RI-DR.docxDOC
SWZ_ZP.271.2.2026.RI-DR.docx

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SWZ_ZP.271.2.2026.RI-DR.pdfPDF
SWZ_ZP.271.2.2026.RI-DR.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the reconstruction of Łukowska Street in Łyski, including sanitary sewage system renovation.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for road reconstruction and sewage renovation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable submission deadline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The submission deadline, while active, could be considered tight for complex construction projects. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents provide necessary technical details. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and CPV code. The estimated value is not disclosed, and financing details are missing, which affects the completeness of the financial information. The duration of the contract is also not specified.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Reiluus85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible, and the criteria, though not fully detailed, are not overtly tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for transparency.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a contract start date and specific financing information reduces its practicality for potential bidders needing to plan resources and financial arrangements.

No e-submission (implied by 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' but not explicitly stated as a requirement for submission)
Missing contract start date
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates are logical within the context of an active tender.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are common in modern public tenders. It is not indicated as EU-funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear project description and scope
Availability of technical documentation
E-procurement enabled
Active status with a defined deadline

Huolenaiheet

Undisclosed estimated value
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of financing and contract start date information
Absence of sustainability considerations

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract for better transparency.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to guide bidders and ensure a fair assessment process.
3. Include information on financing and the expected contract start date.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin