Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Rakennusten purkaminen Minskas- ja Krimuldas-kadulla. BID-kehitys, tekijän valvonta ja rakennustyöt

Avoin
Määräaika
11 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 27, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
169170
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Latgale, Latvia
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 26, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 26, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
5 kuukautta
Sijainti
Latgale
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€491,981
Keskim. tarjoukset
3.0
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
20,606 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Rakennusten purkaminen Minskas- ja Krimuldas-kadulla. BID-kehitys, tekijän valvonta ja rakennustyöt

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender requires a comprehensive approach to building demolition, encompassing design, supervision, and execution. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, efficient project management, and a clear understanding of the contracting authority's needs, even in the absence of explicit evaluation criteria. Competitive pricing, while not explicitly weighted, will be crucial.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Reliable and efficient demolition execution from design to completion.

Expertise in navigating complex demolition projects with a focus on safety and regulatory compliance.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Proactive engagement with the Contracting Authority to clarify any ambiguities regarding evaluation criteria or specific project nuances.
Leveraging a strong portfolio of similar demolition projects to build credibility and demonstrate capability.
Highlighting efficient project management and scheduling to meet the 5-month duration, demonstrating value for money.
Keskeiset haasteet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume a balanced approach where technical capability, price, and project management are implicitly important. Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas and presenting a compelling narrative of value.

Potential for high competition given the nature of the work and the absence of explicit barriers to entry (e.g., specific certifications not mentioned).

Focus on clear differentiation through superior project planning, safety protocols, and a strong emphasis on quality and timely delivery.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
An experienced construction company with a proven track record in demolition projects, possessing in-house design capabilities or strong partnerships with demolition design firms. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of Latvian construction regulations, a commitment to safety, and efficient project execution methodologies.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Development of demolition design documentation
Author's supervision
Construction works for building demolition
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Meeting Eligibility Requirements
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated experience in complex urban demolition projects with minimal disruption.
Innovative (though not explicitly required) approaches to waste management and material recycling, even if not a formal evaluation point.
A highly experienced and qualified project team with clear roles and responsibilities.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the demolition phase as a goodwill gesture and potential differentiator, especially if local community engagement is implicitly valued by the municipality.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Technical Capability (Design, Supervision, Construction)

Provide detailed methodologies for each phase, showcasing expertise and relevant past project examples. Ensure all team members are highly qualified and their experience is clearly articulated.

Price

Develop a competitive yet profitable pricing strategy. Ensure all costs are accurately accounted for, including potential unforeseen issues, and present a clear breakdown if possible. Benchmarking against similar projects (if data is available) is advisable.

Project Management and Schedule Adherence

Present a detailed project plan with clear milestones, resource allocation, and risk mitigation strategies. Emphasize the ability to complete the project within the 5-month timeframe.

Suositukset6
Thoroughly Document Demolition Design Process
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Provide a detailed methodology for the development of demolition design documentation, including site surveys, structural analysis, and environmental impact assessments. Showcase expertise in ensuring safety and compliance with all relevant Latvian building codes and regulations.

Directly addresses a core technical requirement and demonstrates essential capability.
Assume Balanced Evaluation and Maximize All Areas
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a balanced approach where technical merit, price, and project management are all important. Aim to exceed minimum requirements in all these areas to present a robust and comprehensive bid.

Increases the likelihood of a favorable evaluation regardless of the actual weighting.
Highlight Safety and Environmental Management Protocols
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Even though 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects' are marked as 'No', a strong emphasis on robust safety protocols, waste management, and responsible site closure can differentiate the bid. Detail specific procedures for hazardous material handling and site remediation.

Builds trust and demonstrates responsible execution, potentially appealing to the municipality's broader interests.
Develop a Detailed Project Execution Plan
KorkeaKorkea vaiva

Create a comprehensive project plan that clearly outlines phases, timelines, resource allocation, key personnel, and contingency plans. This plan should demonstrate a clear understanding of the 5-month duration and how it will be met efficiently.

Demonstrates project management competence and commitment to timely delivery.
Proactively Address Potential Site-Specific Challenges
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Anticipate potential challenges unique to the Minsk and Krimuldas streets location (e.g., traffic, proximity to other structures, underground utilities). Outline how these challenges will be managed and mitigated in the project plan.

Shows foresight and preparedness, reducing perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Consider Local Employment/Training Commitment
MatalaMatala vaiva

Despite 'Social Aspects: No', a brief mention of a commitment to utilizing local labor or providing on-the-job training during the demolition phase can be a positive, low-effort addition that might subtly influence perception.

Potential for positive perception and subtle differentiation.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most reliable and experienced choice for a complex demolition project, emphasizing a seamless transition from design to construction. Highlight a proven ability to deliver on time and within budget, even without explicit evaluation criteria for these aspects.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

7 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (1)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (3)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Development of demolition design documentation
--Author's supervision
--Construction works for building demolition
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

3 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169170_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260326053225.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the first part of a tender, specifically for the development of demolition design documentation, author supervision, and construction works for a building on Minskas street in Daugavpils.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169170_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260326053225.pdf -- 96.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the demolition of buildings on Minsk and Krimuldas streets, including the development of design documentation, author's supervision, and construction works.

Nolikums_DVP 2026/33DOC
Nolikums_DVP-2026-33.docx -- 154.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the demolition of buildings, including the development of design documentation, author's supervision, and construction works at Minsk and Krimuldas streets in Daugavpils.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for building demolition works in Daugavpils is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria raises concerns regarding transparency and fairness.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can impact legal compliance if not properly addressed in the full documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
Selkeys80/100

The description of works is clear, and technical specifications are provided in separate documents. The requirements for technical capability are outlined, contributing to good clarity.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Reiluus85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement. While no specific company tailoring is evident, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and potentially restricted document access (as flagged) could impact fairness.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender is active and has a contract duration. However, the absence of explicit information regarding e-submission functionality and financing details limits its practicality score.

No e-submission (implied by lack of explicit mention)
Financing info not explicitly detailed
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear technical requirements provided
Open tender procedure with e-procurement
Reasonable submission deadline and contract duration
CPV code and NUTS code provided

Huolenaiheet

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin