Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Portadownin tulvasuojeluohjelma Vaihe 1

Avoin
Määräaika
173 päivää jäljellä
Marraskuu 01, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Restricted Procedure
Viite
007137-2026
Arvo
£57,600,000
Sijainti
Northern Ireland, Iso-Britannia
Julkaistu
Toukokuu 04, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Tammikuu 27, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Lokakuu 25, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Marraskuu 01, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Marraskuu 01, 2026

Budjetti
£57,600,000
Kesto
73 kuukautta
Sijainti
Northern Ireland
Tyyppi
Restricted Procedure
67
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Taloudelliset toimijat kutsutaan hakemaan NEC-osallistumisvaiheen prosessissa Portadownin tulvasuojeluohjelmaa varten. Jopa 8 toimittajaa valitaan lyhytlistalle vaiheen 1 tarjouskilpailua varten. 6 parhaiten sijoittunutta tarjoajaa nimitetään puitesopimukseen ja kutsutaan tekemään tarjouksia vaiheisiin 2 ja 3.

Riskianalyysi

Riskianalyysi ei ole vielä saatavilla tämän maan tarjouskilpailuille. Tällä hetkellä tuettu: Viro, Latvia, Liettua, Puola, Ranska, Iso-Britannia, Tanska, Alankomaat, Norja ja Suomi.

Voittostrategia

Hanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

Kirjaudu sisään

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

12 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (4)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Apply in the initial NEC Participation Stage process.
--Adhere to the Participation Stage submission deadline of 2026-11-01T00:00:00+00:00.
--If shortlisted from the Participation Stage, submit a tender for Phase 1 of the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Suppliers must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Satisfy all completeness and compliance checks during the Participation Stage.
--Satisfy all requirements related to legal capacity during the Participation Stage.
--Achieve sufficiently high overall scores in the Participation Stage evaluation to be shortlisted (up to 8 suppliers, including ties).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Demonstrate proven technical capability and experience in civil engineering works, specifically for flood alleviation schemes.
--Be familiar with NEC contracts, as the procurement involves an NEC Participation Stage process.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Satisfy all requirements related to financial capacity during the Participation Stage.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

3 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

OCDS RecordDOC
007137-2026_ocds_record.json

This tender outlines a restricted procurement process for the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme, requiring an initial Participation Stage to shortlist up to 8 suppliers based on legal, financial, and scoring criteria for Phase 1, with a Framework Agreement for subsequent phases.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
007137-2026_ocds_release.json

This tender outlines a restricted procurement process for the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme, involving a participation stage to shortlist up to 8 suppliers for Phase 1, with the top 6 forming a framework for subsequent phases.

Official PDF VersionPDF
007137-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme, detailing a two-stage restricted procurement process involving an initial Participation Stage to shortlist up to 8 suppliers for Phase 1, followed by the establishment of a Framework Agreement for the top 6 ranked tenderers for subsequent phases.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

67
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender outlines a complex multi-stage procurement for a significant flood alleviation scheme, demonstrating good clarity in process description but suffering from critical issues such as missing detailed evaluation criteria, lack of e-submission, and an irrelevant attached document.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender clearly defines the restricted procedure and competitive flexible approach, with an appropriate CPV code. The submission deadline for the Participation Stage is exceptionally generous, ensuring ample preparation time. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date are minor transparency concerns.

Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings
Missing reveal date
Selkeys80/100

The description of the multi-stage process, including shortlisting, tie-breaking rules, and the framework agreement for subsequent phases, is very clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-categorized. The primary deficiency is the lack of specific, detailed evaluation criteria and their weightings for the Participation Stage and Phase 1.

No specific, detailed evaluation criteria and weightings provided
Täydellisyys70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location are well-provided. However, the inclusion of an entirely irrelevant document (Lichfield District Council tender) is a significant error in the tender package. Furthermore, detailed evaluation criteria are not fully defined.

Irrelevant document attached to the tender package
Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings
Reiluus65/100

The tender value is disclosed, and the deadline for the Participation Stage is very reasonable, promoting fair preparation. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. Nevertheless, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria reduces transparency and objectivity, and the lack of e-submission creates a barrier to equal access for potential bidders.

No e-submission functionality
Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings
Käytännöllisyys55/100

The absence of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. The contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and creates ambiguity, hindering practical planning. While documents are available, a direct URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

No e-submission functionality
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus55/100

Most key fields are populated, and no disputes are reported. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' are missing. Critically, the contract start date is identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. The presence of an irrelevant document also indicates a significant inconsistency in the overall tender data package.

Contract start date is illogical (same as submission deadline)
Irrelevant document attached
Kestävyys50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'social value' as a criterion for Phases 2 and 3, which is a positive inclusion of social aspects. However, there is no explicit focus on green procurement or innovation in the provided information for the initial stages, and it is not EU funded.

No explicit green procurement focus
No explicit innovation focus

Vahvuudet

Clear description of the multi-stage procurement process and framework
High estimated value disclosed and not classified
Very reasonable deadline for the Participation Stage (over 9 months)
CPV code is appropriate for the works
Requirements appear generic and not tailored

Huolenaiheet

Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings for all stages
Lack of e-submission functionality
Inclusion of an irrelevant document in the tender package
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Limited explicit focus on green procurement or innovation

Suositukset

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria and weightings for all stages to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Implement e-submission functionality to improve accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.
3. Rectify the tender package by removing irrelevant documents and ensuring all attached files pertain to this specific tender.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin