Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Ruben-puiston järjestely, Jēkabpilsin kunta

Avoin
Määräaika
12 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 28, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
167076
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Zemgale, Latvia
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 29, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
lowest price100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 29, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Zemgale
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€491,981
Keskim. tarjoukset
3.0
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
20,606 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Ruben-puiston järjestely, Jēkabpilsin kunta
EU-rahoitteinen

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for Rubeņu Park landscaping is a price-driven opportunity. Success hinges on meticulous cost control, efficient execution, and demonstrating value beyond the lowest bid, even without explicit social or innovative criteria. Focus on a lean, high-quality delivery model.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering high-quality park landscaping at the most competitive price.

Reliable Local Partner: Proven ability to execute municipal projects efficiently within Jēkabpils novads.

Quality Craftsmanship: Ensuring durable and aesthetically pleasing park furniture and landscaping.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Price-driven evaluation allows for aggressive bidding if cost efficiencies are identified.
Detailed specifications for park furniture and work volumes provide a clear basis for accurate costing and planning.
Lack of explicit social value or innovation requirements simplifies bid focus on core delivery.
Keskeiset haasteet
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond lowest price creates uncertainty and potential for subjective interpretation if not managed carefully.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas, particularly quality of materials and workmanship, to build confidence. Ensure all documentation is flawless and directly addresses the specifications.

Lack of disclosed estimated value makes precise pricing strategy more challenging.

Conduct thorough market research and benchmark against similar projects to establish a realistic cost baseline. Prepare multiple pricing scenarios.

Missing information on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements necessitates proactive clarification.

Submit formal requests for clarification to the contracting authority regarding all missing mandatory and desirable requirements well in advance of the deadline.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized construction or landscaping company with proven experience in municipal park projects, strong local supply chain relationships in Jēkabpils novads, and a highly efficient operational model capable of delivering high-quality work at a competitive price.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Compliance with Park Specification (DOCUMENT 2)
Accurate and comprehensive Work Volumes (DOCUMENT 4)
Adherence to Tender Regulations (DOCUMENT 3)
Meeting Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (implied)
Meeting Eligibility Requirements (implied)
Meeting Technical Capability Requirements (implied)
Meeting Financial Requirements (implied)
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated local sourcing and employment within Jēkabpils novads, even if not explicitly required.
Detailed, proactive risk assessment and mitigation plan for the project execution.
Presentation of a highly efficient, lean project management methodology.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
Commit to sourcing a percentage of materials from local Jēkabpils novads suppliers to support the local economy.
Offer to provide a short training session or site visit for local students interested in landscaping/construction.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Price100% (implied)

Develop a highly accurate cost model based on detailed analysis of 'Darbu apjomi' (DOCUMENT 4) and 'Parka specifikācija' (DOCUMENT 2). Identify opportunities for cost savings through efficient logistics, material sourcing, and optimized labor deployment. Ensure a competitive but sustainable margin.

Suositukset6
Thoroughly Analyze Park Specifications and Work Volumes
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Meticulously review 'Parka specifikācija' (DOCUMENT 2) and 'Darbu apjomi' (DOCUMENT 4) to ensure complete understanding of material requirements, dimensions, design, and quantities. Any deviation or misinterpretation will lead to non-compliance or cost overruns.

Ensures bid accuracy, compliance, and competitive pricing.
Develop a Lean and Competitive Pricing Strategy
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 'lowest price' evaluation, focus on optimizing all cost elements. Leverage local supplier relationships for materials and equipment. Implement efficient work methodologies to minimize labor and time. Conduct thorough risk assessment to avoid unforeseen costs.

Maximizes chances of winning on price while maintaining profitability.
Proactively Seek Clarification on Missing Requirements
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Submit formal requests for clarification to Jēkabpils novada pašvaldība regarding all missing information on exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements. This is crucial for bid completeness and avoiding disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures a compliant bid.
Highlight Local Presence and Experience
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Even without explicit requirements, emphasize any local experience in Jēkabpils novads or proximity to the park. Showcase understanding of local conditions and community needs. This can build trust and rapport with the contracting authority.

Builds confidence and potentially influences subjective aspects of the evaluation.
Prepare a Detailed Project Execution Plan
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Outline a clear, step-by-step plan for project execution, including timelines, resource allocation, quality control measures, and site management. This demonstrates competence and foresight, even if not explicitly evaluated.

Enhances bid credibility and demonstrates project management capability.
Incorporate Local Sourcing Commitment
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Include a commitment to sourcing a defined percentage of materials (e.g., timber, plants) from local businesses within Jēkabpils novads. This aligns with broader public sector goals and can be a subtle differentiator.

Adds value beyond price and demonstrates community support.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-efficient provider without compromising on the quality specified in 'Parka specifikācija'. Highlight operational efficiencies and lean project management. Emphasize reliability and a proven track record in similar municipal works, even if not explicitly stated as a requirement.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

5 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (1)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

4 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167076_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329161207.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the improvement of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Darbu apjomiXLS
Darbu apjomi (1).xls -- 246.0 KB

This document contains a list of work volumes for the Rubeņi park landscaping project, detailing various tasks, units, quantities, and costs.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_JNP_2026_32_Rubeņi.docx -- 448.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the landscaping of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, with the contract awarded based on the lowest price.

Parka specifikācijaXLS
Rubeņu parka labiekārtojuma specifikācija kop... -- 1.8 MB

This document contains a specification for park furniture elements, including benches, tables with benches, and insect hotels, detailing their materials, dimensions, and design requirements.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for Rubeņu Park landscaping is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting overall completeness and fairness.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure rules, with a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the park landscaping is clear, and the attached documents (work volumes, park specification) provide detailed technical requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes the award basis less transparent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines and location. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted section, suggesting these might be in the documents but not explicitly summarized.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Reiluus85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement suggests a fair process. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of a direct URL for document submission and the absence of information regarding contract start date and financing details reduce its practicality.

No e-submission (implied, as no URL provided)
Missing contract start date
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined CPV code and location
Open procedure with e-procurement
Detailed technical specifications available

Huolenaiheet

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Restricted document access flagged
Lack of detail on financial and eligibility requirements

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all interested parties.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin