UKP organisaation kehittäminen

This tender for organisational development services is generally well-structured, with a clear description of objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the contract start date. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor oversight.

The description of the required services is clear and detailed, outlining the scope of support for funded organisations. The eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-defined, although the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content limits the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

The tender is open to any supplier or consortium, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but the overall structure promotes fair competition.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of accessible tender documents with content reduce its practicality for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the timeline is consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.