Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Saku kunnan julkisten viheralueiden hoito vuonna 2026

Suljettu
Määräaika
0 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 15, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
308331
Arvo
€180,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 30, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid amount100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 30, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 08, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Huhtikuu 30, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€180,000
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€43,718
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.8
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
562 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Saku kunnan julkisten viheralueiden hoito vuonna 2026.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for Saku municipality's green area maintenance prioritizes cost-effectiveness. A winning strategy will focus on a highly competitive price while demonstrating robust operational capability and meticulous adherence to technical specifications. Leveraging efficient operational models and precise costings will be paramount.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality green space maintenance at the most competitive price.

Reliable Execution: Ensuring consistent and compliant service delivery through proven operational excellence.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Significant cost advantage due to primary evaluation criterion.
Opportunity to demonstrate operational efficiency through equipment and workforce confirmations.
Clear technical requirements allow for precise bid preparation.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to the primary evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential efficiencies in operations, and explore bulk purchasing or optimized resource allocation to achieve the lowest possible bid price without compromising quality.

Strict adherence to submission requirements and formats.

Develop a detailed checklist based on all submission instructions (Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx, Hankepass, ESPD) and assign responsibility for each item. Conduct a pre-submission review by a dedicated team to ensure all requirements are met precisely.

Potential for overlooked technical details in the provided documents.

Dedicate significant time to thoroughly review and understand 'Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.doc' and 'Tehn_kirj_lisa_ hooldusklasside põhinõuded.pdf'. If any ambiguities exist, utilize the clarification process provided by the contracting authority.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A well-established landscaping and grounds maintenance company with a proven track record in municipal contracts, possessing a strong local presence, efficient operational processes, a skilled and certified workforce, and a fleet of well-maintained equipment. They should have a sophisticated cost management system to offer a highly competitive price.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Compliance with the technical description (Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.doc)
Adherence to the basic requirements for maintenance classes (Tehn_kirj_lisa_ hooldusklasside põhinõuded.pdf)
Confirmation of a qualified site manager
Confirmation of necessary equipment
Confirmation of necessary workforce
Lowest total cost receives maximum points
Electronic submission according to instructions
Completion of Hankepass electronically
Submission of ESPD in .xml format
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrable operational efficiencies leading to a lower cost base.
A highly experienced and certified site manager with a clear understanding of municipal green space management.
A proactive approach to service delivery, ensuring proactive issue identification and resolution.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly requested, consider a commitment to employing local residents or offering apprenticeships as a subtle differentiator, especially if it can be achieved without significant cost increase. This could be framed as supporting the local Saku community.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total Cost100%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing operational costs, resource allocation, and potentially leveraging economies of scale. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns to identify areas for efficiency gains.

Technical Compliance

Ensure 100% compliance with all technical specifications and maintenance class requirements. This is a pass/fail element and any deviation will likely lead to disqualification.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given that total cost is the sole evaluation criterion, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid. Conduct a granular cost analysis of all operational aspects, including labor, equipment, materials, and overheads. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising essential service delivery.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Meticulous Technical Specification Adherence
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Thoroughly review and understand 'Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.doc' and 'Tehn_kirj_lisa_ hooldusklasside põhinõuded.pdf'. Ensure all aspects of spring/autumn cleaning, lawn mowing, and hedge maintenance are fully addressed in the bid proposal and operational plan. Any deviation will lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid is compliant and avoids disqualification.
Flawless Submission Document Completion
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Pay extreme attention to detail in completing the Hankepass and ESPD, and ensure all other required documents are submitted electronically in the specified formats and according to 'Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx'. Double-check all mandatory fields and confirmations.

Prevents administrative disqualification due to submission errors.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

While not directly evaluated, subtly highlight how your operational model (e.g., efficient routing, modern equipment, skilled workforce) allows for the competitive pricing offered. This can build confidence in the contracting authority regarding your ability to deliver.

Builds confidence and reinforces the value proposition.
Proactive Clarification Process
KorkeaMatala vaiva

If any aspect of the technical specifications or submission requirements is unclear, proactively submit clarification requests to the Saku Vallavalitsus well before the deadline. This demonstrates diligence and ensures a compliant bid.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and potential disqualification.
Consider Local Employment Commitment
MatalaMatala vaiva

If feasible within the cost structure, include a statement about prioritizing local employment or offering training opportunities. This can be a soft differentiator if it doesn't inflate costs.

Potential for positive perception and subtle differentiation.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential quality and compliance. Emphasize operational efficiency as the enabler of this value proposition. Highlight the reliability and proven capability to meet all technical requirements, assuring the contracting authority that the lowest price does not equate to a higher risk.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

17 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (8)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (5)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bids must be submitted according to the instructions in "Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx".
--The bid must be prepared considering the contract project (Lisa 2_Hankeleping.docx).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned, but general exclusion principles apply.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm compliance with qualification requirements.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender document conditions.
--Bidders must provide confirmation of a qualified site manager.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Compliance with the technical description (Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.doc).
--Adherence to the basic requirements for maintenance classes (Tehn_kirj_lisa_ hooldusklasside põhinõuded.pdf), including spring and autumn cleaning, lawn mowing, and hedge maintenance.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest value receiving maximum points.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

8 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
308331_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

Bidders must submit compliance conditions, including confirmation of a qualified site manager, necessary equipment and workforce, and agreement with tender document terms.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308331_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the primary weight is on the total bid amount, with the lowest value receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308331_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.2 KB

The tender pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary proof of meeting the contracting authority's qualification requirements, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 405.5 KB

This tender for Saku municipality's green area maintenance includes a technical specification detailing specific requirements and standards.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2_Hankeleping.docx -- 26.2 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms, rights, and obligations for the maintenance of Saku municipality's green areas from May to November 2026.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx -- 41.5 KB

This document provides instructions for submitting a bid for the Saku municipality green area maintenance 2026 tender, specifying electronic submission and general conditions.

Tehnilise kirjelduse lisad_kaardidZIP
Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa_kaardid.zip -- 4.2 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa_hooldusklasside nõudedPDF
Tehn_kirj_lisa_ hooldusklasside põhinõuded.pd... -- 71.1 KB

This document outlines the basic requirements for maintenance classes of Saku municipality's green areas, including spring and autumn cleaning, lawn mowing, and hedge maintenance, which are necessary for preparing a bid.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for Saku municipality's green area maintenance is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and some documentation is not directly machine-readable.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated as being in the tender documents.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented in attached files. Evaluation criteria are specified, with a clear emphasis on the lowest bid price. Conditions for compliance are also outlined.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the financing condition is referenced as being in the contract project, which is not directly accessible for AI analysis. The ESPD is in XML format, which is not directly analyzed.

Financing condition referenced in contract project, not directly stated.
Reiluus85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). E-procurement is utilized, promoting fairness. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is provided for the opening place. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is linked to the contract project. The duration is defined.

Some key documents (ESPD, zip file) are not directly machine-readable for AI analysis, potentially impacting automated processing.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear description of services and requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and contract start date.

Huolenaiheet

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Some critical documents (ESPD, zip file) are not directly machine-readable for AI analysis.
Financing condition is referenced in an attached document rather than being directly stated.

Suositukset

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into future tenders.
2. Ensure all critical documents are in machine-readable formats where possible to facilitate automated analysis.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin