Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Laevan peruskoulun ilmanvaihtojärjestelmän rakentaminen

Avoin
Määräaika
4 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 22, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
308231
Arvo
€80,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 27, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Bid price100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 27, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 22, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 22, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Toukokuu 17, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€80,000
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Laevan peruskoulun ilmanvaihtojärjestelmän rakentaminen Laevan kylässä, Tarton kunnassa, KVJ OÜ:n laatiman pääsuunnitelman ja julkisten hankintojen asiakirjojen mukaisesti.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for Laeva Primary School's ventilation system construction is a price-driven opportunity. Success hinges on a highly competitive bid, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and efficient project delivery. While social value and innovation are absent, demonstrating robust technical capability and a clear understanding of the project scope will be crucial.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

The most cost-effective and technically compliant solution for Laeva Primary School's ventilation system.

Guaranteed adherence to all technical specifications and construction norms for a reliable and long-lasting system.

Efficient and timely project execution with minimal disruption.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Price-driven evaluation offers a direct path to winning if a highly competitive bid is submitted.
The absence of subcontractors simplifies bid preparation and execution, reducing risk and potential cost overruns.
Clear technical specifications and main project documents provide a solid foundation for accurate cost estimation and technical proposal.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion being cost.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, and streamline labor deployment. Consider lean construction methodologies to minimize waste and maximize efficiency. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitive pricing without compromising quality.

Strict adherence to technical specifications and construction norms requires meticulous attention to detail.

Assign experienced technical personnel to review all project documents thoroughly. Develop a detailed quality assurance plan that aligns with Estonian construction norms. Conduct internal reviews of the technical proposal before submission.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized construction company with proven experience in HVAC installation, particularly in public sector or educational facilities. The ideal bidder possesses strong project management skills, a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing, and a deep understanding of Estonian construction norms and regulations. They should also be capable of self-performing the majority of the work to avoid subcontractor complexities.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Compliance with construction norms (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx)
Completion of 'Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm' detailing cost (Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx)
Submission of completed electronic Hankepass (ESPD)
Confirmation of non-involvement of subcontractors
Adherence to contract terms, scope, deadlines, and penalties (Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt.docx)
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
A demonstrably lower-than-average cost for the scope of work, achieved through operational efficiencies.
A clear and concise technical proposal that directly addresses all aspects of the main project and technical description, highlighting any minor value-adding suggestions (even if not explicitly requested).
A strong track record of successful, similar-scale HVAC installations in public buildings, evidenced by references (if allowed/applicable).
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not a formal requirement, consider a brief statement on local employment or waste reduction during construction to demonstrate a responsible approach, even if it doesn't directly impact scoring.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Price100%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all technical and eligibility requirements are met. This requires meticulous cost breakdown and optimization.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price the Bid
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given that price is the sole evaluation criterion, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid that still allows for profitable execution. Conduct a detailed cost analysis, explore all avenues for cost reduction in materials and labor, and ensure the bid is competitive but not unsustainable.

Directly impacts win probability as it's the sole scoring metric.
Meticulously Comply with Technical Specifications
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Thoroughly review and understand the 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx' and the main project documents. Ensure the bid proposal clearly demonstrates how all technical requirements, including compliance with construction norms, will be met. Any deviation or ambiguity could lead to disqualification or a lower perceived technical capability.

Ensures bid validity and avoids technical disqualification.
Accurately Complete Cost Form
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure 'Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm' is completed accurately and comprehensively, reflecting the overall bid price. Any errors or omissions in this form can lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid validity and accurate cost representation.
Confirm No Subcontractors
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Explicitly confirm the non-involvement of subcontractors as required. If subcontractors are unavoidable for specific niche tasks, explore if this is permissible under the 'joint offer authorization' or if it constitutes a disqualifying factor. Ideally, plan to self-perform all works.

Avoids disqualification based on subcontractor policy.
Streamline Project Management for Efficiency
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Develop a lean project management plan that emphasizes efficiency and timely completion. Given the absence of specified duration, demonstrating a clear and achievable timeline within the contract's implied scope will be beneficial, even if not directly scored. This also supports cost-effectiveness.

Supports cost competitiveness and efficient execution.
Thoroughly Review Draft Contract
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Scrutinize 'Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt.docx' for any onerous clauses, particularly regarding penalties, warranties, and defect liability periods. Ensure the bid price adequately accounts for these contractual obligations.

Mitigates financial and legal risks post-award.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer that fully meets all technical requirements, emphasizing cost savings for the municipality without compromising quality or compliance.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

18 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (8)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (5)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The tender is for the construction of the ventilation system at Laeva Primary School (from Name)
--The contracting authority is Tartu Rural Municipality Government (from Authority)
--The CPV code is Installation of ventilation equipment (from CPV)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tender is not divided into parts because the construction works are not technically separable, and separation would be difficult to manage and cause additional costs to the contracting authority.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Joint offer authorization (from 308231_vastavustingimused.pdf)
--Business secret description (from 308231_vastavustingimused.pdf)
--Confirmation of non-involvement of subcontractors (from 308231_vastavustingimused.pdf)
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Construction works must comply with construction norms (from Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx)
--Maintenance work must be performed (from Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx)
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated solely on the basis of cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score (from 308231_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf)
--The bidder must submit the completed form "Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm" detailing the cost of construction works (from Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx)

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
308231_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.7 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to provide a power of attorney for joint bids, a description of trade secrets, confirmation of not involving subcontractors, and confirmation of bid cost and equivalency.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm dokumendiXLS
Lisa 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 22.3 KB

The bidder must submit a completed form "Appendix 3 - Bid Price Form" detailing the cost of construction works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308231_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

In the tender for "Construction of Laeva Primary School Ventilation System", bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308231_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.5 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, required for tender participation, but is filled out electronically.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument.docx -- 33.1 KB

This document outlines the foundational principles and guidelines for the public procurement of constructing the ventilation system at Laeva Primary School, which is necessary for bid submission.

Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 34.5 KB

The contracting authority seeks a bidder to construct the ventilation system for Laeva Primary School, based on provided main projects and technical specifications, requiring compliance with construction norms and site maintenance.

Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 58.2 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms, scope of work, deadlines, and penalty clauses for the construction of the ventilation system for Laeva Primary School.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for the construction of a ventilation system at Laeva Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific provisions for sustainability and innovation.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure is clearly defined. Deadlines are reasonable, and there is no indication of disputes. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented in various attached files. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, which is understandable, though the specific weighting is not detailed in the provided text. The conditions for participation are outlined.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the specific weighting for the evaluation criteria is not explicitly stated, and some documents are marked as 'No' for 'Required', which could lead to confusion about their necessity for submission.

Specific weighting for evaluation criteria not detailed.
Some required documents marked as not required.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation is based on cost, which is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competition.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender utilizes electronic submission and e-procurement. A contract start date is specified. However, information regarding financing is not explicitly provided, and the URL for opening place is generic.

Financing information not explicitly provided.
Generic URL for opening place.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Vahvuudet

Clear description of works and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Full e-procurement and e-submission process.
All essential basic information is present.

Huolenaiheet

Lack of explicit sustainability and innovation requirements.
Some required documents are not marked as mandatory.
Missing explicit details on financing.

Suositukset

1. Clearly define the weighting for evaluation criteria.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability and innovation criteria.
3. Clarify the mandatory nature of all listed documents.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin