TAKSIKULJETUKSET 2026-2029

This tender for taxi services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code, a clear procedure type, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The title and description clearly state the service required (taxi provision for home to school and support services). However, the lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders.

Essential information like title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and deadline are present. However, crucial details such as contract duration, specific exclusion/eligibility/technical/financial/submission requirements, and the content of the tender documents are missing.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. The lack of specific requirements, while a clarity issue, also means no criteria are tailored to specific companies, thus maintaining a degree of fairness.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the absence of a contract start date and explicit financing information, along with the lack of detailed requirements, reduces overall practicality for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is active.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.