Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Tallinnan eläintarhan lastenjunalaitteen palvelun tarjoaminen 2026-2029

Avoin
Määräaika
15 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 30, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
308144
Arvo
€10,500
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 30, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Bid evaluation Cost - highest is best100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 30, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 23, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 30, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 30, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Toukokuu 10, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€10,500
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€472,450
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.3
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
317 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Sopimuksen kohteena on sähkökäyttöisen lastenjunalaitteen palvelun tarjoaminen Tallinnan eläintarhassa vuosina 2026-2029. Käyttöön annetaan Lasten rautatie – ovaalinmuotoinen noin 175 metrin pituinen raide (raideleveys 890 mm), joka sijaitsee noin 1700 m2:n alueella eläintarhan suljetulla alueella.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for the Tallinn Zoo children's train attraction presents a unique opportunity focused on operational excellence and cost-effectiveness. The key to winning lies in demonstrating a robust operational plan for the specified track and equipment, coupled with a highly competitive financial offer, as price is the sole evaluation criterion. Proactive engagement with the Hankepass and clear confirmation of non-affiliation with Russian entities are critical for eligibility.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Reliable and Safe Operation of the Children's Train Attraction

Maximizing Value for Tallinn Zoo through a Competitive Financial Offer

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
The tender is based on a concession agreement, which may offer some flexibility in operational details beyond the core requirements.
The estimated value is relatively low, suggesting a potentially less competitive field, especially if bidders focus solely on the financial aspect.
The specific track dimensions (175m, 890mm gauge) and area (1700m2) are clearly defined, allowing for precise operational planning and cost estimation.
Keskeiset haasteet
The sole evaluation criterion being the highest price means intense price competition, potentially squeezing margins.

Develop a highly efficient operational model and secure cost-effective sourcing for train equipment if not already owned. Explore economies of scale if the bidder operates multiple similar attractions.

The Hankepass (ESPD) is an electronic self-declaration, requiring meticulous completion to avoid exclusion. The AI analysis of the ESPD document was not supported, highlighting the need for manual, careful review.

Dedicate sufficient time and resources to accurately complete the Hankepass. Have a senior team member or legal counsel review it before submission. Understand the specific requirements of the 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' document.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price means bidders must infer the importance of other aspects like technical capability and operational plan, even if not directly scored.

While price is paramount, a technically sound and operationally robust proposal will instill confidence in the contracting authority, potentially influencing their perception if any qualitative aspects are implicitly considered or if there are tie-breaking scenarios.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
An experienced operator of small-scale amusement or transport attractions, with a proven track record of safe and reliable service delivery. The ideal bidder will possess the necessary train equipment or have a clear, cost-effective plan for its acquisition/rental, and a strong understanding of operating within a public, family-oriented environment. They must also be adept at completing complex electronic procurement documentation like the Hankepass.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation
Completion of Hankepass (ESPD) electronically
Demonstrated technical capability to operate a children's train attraction on the provided track
Highest price (financial offer) as the sole evaluation criterion
Compliance with the Public Procurement Act
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
A demonstrably superior safety record for operating children's attractions.
A highly detailed and realistic operational plan that addresses the specific constraints of the Tallinn Zoo environment.
A proactive and responsive approach to communication with the contracting authority during the tender process.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
Commitment to employing local staff for operational roles, contributing to local employment opportunities.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Financial Offer (Price)100%

Submit the most aggressive price possible while ensuring profitability. Conduct thorough cost analysis, including operational, maintenance, and potential contingency costs. Benchmark against similar services if possible.

Suositukset6
Meticulously Complete Hankepass (ESPD)
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Ensure all sections of the Hankepass are accurately and completely filled out electronically. Pay close attention to the confirmation of no Russian Federation connections. This is the primary gatekeeper for eligibility.

Ensures eligibility to bid.
Aggressively Price the Bid
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

As price is the sole evaluation criterion, the winning bid will be the highest price. Develop a lean operational cost model and submit a highly competitive offer that maximizes the chances of winning while remaining profitable.

Directly determines the winning bid.
Demonstrate Operational Readiness and Expertise
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

While not explicitly scored, a clear and detailed operational plan for the children's train, including maintenance, safety protocols, and staffing, will build confidence. Reference experience with similar attractions.

Increases confidence in bidder's ability to deliver the service.
Verify All Subcontractor/Supplier Affiliations
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure no direct or indirect connections to the Russian Federation, as per the mandatory exclusion grounds.

Prevents disqualification.
Understand Concession Agreement Implications
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Review the tender documents carefully to understand the specifics of the concession agreement. Identify any areas where flexibility might exist or where specific responsibilities are allocated to the concessionaire.

Informs operational planning and risk assessment.
Propose Local Employment
MatalaMatala vaiva

Include a commitment to hiring local personnel for operational roles. This aligns with general public procurement expectations for social value, even if not explicitly requested.

Enhances bid perception and potential alignment with broader public goals.
Kilpailuasema
Focus on being the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential safety and operational standards. Highlight efficiency and lean operations to justify a highly competitive price. Emphasize reliability and a hassle-free operational experience for the Tallinn Zoo.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

13 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (1)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (4)
Taloudellinen (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is an initial proof of the economic operator's compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, which is filled out electronically and contains the conditions set by the contracting authority.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm they do not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--The tender is based on the conclusion of a concession agreement.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The service is for operating a children's train attraction.
--The service will be provided on the territory of the Tallinn Zoo.
--The tenderer will be provided with the rental of the railway track and waiting pavilion.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated based on the total cost excluding VAT.
--The highest price is considered the best.
--The successful bid will be determined by the highest price.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

8 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
308144_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.8 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308144_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the total cost excluding taxes, where the highest price is the best, and the winning bid will be determined by the highest price.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308144_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.2 KB

The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration of a company's compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, to be filled electronically and containing the conditions set by the contracting authority.

RHAD - Lasterongi atraktsiooni teenuse osutamine 2026-2029DOC
RHAD - Lasterongi atraktsiooni teenuse osutam... -- 51.3 KB

The Tallinn Zoo invites bids for the provision of a children's train attraction service from 2026-2029, based on a concession agreement and in accordance with public procurement law.

RHAD Lisa 1-1 Territooriumi kaartPDF
RHAD Lisa 1-1 Territooriumi kaart.pdf -- 638.7 KB

This document contains the territory map for the Tallinn Zoo's children's train attraction, necessary for understanding the service provision conditions.

RHAD Lisa 1-2 Lasterongi asukohtPDF
RHAD Lisa 1-2 Lasterongi asukoht.pdf -- 95.8 KB

This document describes the location of the children's train at Tallinn Zoo, which is important information for understanding the service provision conditions.

RHAD Lisa 1 Tehnilised tingimusedDOC
RHAD Lisa 1 Tehnilised tingimused.docx -- 33.4 KB

The Tallinn Zoo is seeking an operator for a children's train attraction service on its premises, offering the rental of a railway track and waiting pavilion.

RHAD Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt - Lasterongi atraktsiooni teenuse osutamine 2026-202...DOC
RHAD Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt - Lasterongi atra... -- 29.7 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for providing a children's train attraction service at the Tallinn Zoo from 2026-2029, including requirements for the leased track and train equipment.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for a children's train attraction service at Tallinn Zoo is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a concession agreement model.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard public procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission period. Compliance with the Public Procurement Act is explicitly stated. No immediate legal disputes or issues are flagged.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the service and the location is clear. Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria are mentioned, although the specific weighting is not detailed in the provided snippet. Conditions for the concession agreement are implied through the contract draft.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Several key documents are attached or referenced, such as technical specifications and a contract draft. However, the specific weighting of evaluation criteria is not fully detailed.

Reiluus85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criteria are stated to be based on relative weighting. The requirement to exclude Russian Federation-connected subcontractors is a specific geopolitical consideration rather than company-tailoring. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. A contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined. The reliance on a concession agreement model might add complexity for some bidders.

Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. The focus is primarily on the operational service.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear description of service and location
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value
Inclusion of contract draft and technical specifications

Huolenaiheet

Limited explicit sustainability considerations
Reliance on a concession agreement model
Weighting of evaluation criteria not fully detailed

Suositukset

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social benefits).
2. Provide more detailed information on the weighting of evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify any specific requirements or implications of the concession agreement model for potential bidders.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin