Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Vanasadaman laiturin nro 18 vanhan osan seinien korjaustyöt

Avoin
Määräaika
2 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 17, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
308135
Arvo
€150,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 25, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Bid price (excluding VAT)100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 25, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 10, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 17, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 17, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€150,000
Kesto
8 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Julkisen hankinnan kohteena ovat Vanasadaman laiturin nro 18 vanhan osan seinien korjaustyöt. Tekninen kuvaus on esitetty RHAD:n liitteessä 1.
Vihreä hankintaSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for Vanasadam pier repair is heavily weighted towards price (100%). A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest compliant bid while demonstrating strong technical capability and adherence to environmental requirements. Leveraging efficient project management and a lean operational model will be crucial for cost competitiveness.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-Effective, Compliant Quay Repair Expertise

Delivering Value Through Lean Execution and Proven Port Infrastructure Experience

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Aggressive pricing due to 100% price weighting.
Demonstrating efficiency in project execution to justify a lower bid.
Leveraging existing relationships with suppliers for cost savings on materials.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and ensure all overheads are minimized. Consider lean construction methodologies and efficient resource allocation.

Meeting the specific technical requirements of quay repair without over-engineering.

Thoroughly review Lisa 1 (Tehniline kirjeldus) and ensure the proposed solution is the most cost-efficient way to meet all specifications. Engage technical experts to validate the approach.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.

Conduct a detailed site visit (April 9, 2026, at 10:00) and factor in a realistic contingency for potential issues. Clearly define scope and responsibilities in the bid.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized construction company with a proven track record in port infrastructure, specifically quay construction or repair, possessing a lean operational structure that allows for aggressive pricing. They should have a strong understanding of environmental regulations and efficient project execution capabilities.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Bid price (excluding VAT) - 100.0% weight
At least one properly completed port quay construction or repair contract in the last 60 months
Compliance with environmental requirements
Submission of bid price according to the specified structure (Lisa 4)
Submission of completed contract data (Lisa 3)
Adherence to technical specifications (Lisa 1)
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
The most competitive price that still allows for profitable execution.
Demonstrated efficiency in past port repair projects that translates to faster completion or lower resource utilization.
A clear and concise technical proposal that directly addresses the requirements of Lisa 1 with minimal ambiguity.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using local suppliers for materials where feasible, which can indirectly support local employment and reduce transportation emissions.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Bid price (excluding VAT)100.0%

Develop a highly competitive bid by meticulously calculating all direct and indirect costs. Explore opportunities for bulk purchasing, efficient labor deployment, and minimizing waste. Ensure the bid is compliant with all technical specifications to avoid disqualification.

Suositukset6
Price Optimization
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weighting on price, conduct an exhaustive cost breakdown. Identify all direct and indirect costs, including labor, materials, equipment, and overheads. Explore opportunities for economies of scale, efficient logistics, and waste reduction. Benchmark against similar past projects to ensure competitiveness while maintaining profitability.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing the likelihood of winning.
Demonstrate Quay Repair Experience
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure the submitted contract data (Lisa 3) clearly and unequivocally demonstrates at least one completed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months. Highlight the scale, complexity, and successful completion of this project.

Failure to meet this eligibility requirement will lead to disqualification.
Thorough Site Visit and Technical Review
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Attend the mandatory site visit on April 9, 2026. Carefully review Lisa 1 (Tehniline kirjeldus) in conjunction with site observations to identify any potential challenges or cost-saving opportunities. Ensure the proposed repair methodology is the most efficient and cost-effective.

Ensures a compliant and cost-effective technical solution, minimizing risks and potential cost overruns.
Environmental Compliance Assurance
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Explicitly address how the proposed works will comply with environmental requirements. This could include waste management plans, pollution prevention measures, or use of eco-friendly materials if applicable. Document these measures clearly in the bid.

Ensures compliance and avoids potential penalties or disqualification.
Accurate Bid Structure and Data Submission
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Meticulously follow the specified structure for submitting the bid price (Lisa 4) and complete all contract data forms (Lisa 3) accurately and completely. Any discrepancies or omissions could lead to disqualification.

Ensures the bid is formally compliant with submission requirements.
Lean Project Management Approach
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

While not explicitly asked for, subtly highlight in the bid narrative (if space allows) an efficient project management approach that minimizes downtime and resource wastage. This can be inferred from the proposed timeline and methodology.

Can subtly influence the evaluator's perception of value and efficiency, even with price being dominant.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that fully meets all technical and eligibility requirements. Emphasize proven experience in similar port infrastructure projects to build confidence in execution capability despite the low price.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

19 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (9)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (7)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The deadline for submitting bids is April 17, 2026, at 09:00:00.
--Site visit is on April 9, 2026, at 10:00.
--The successful bidder must sign and return the contract within 7 calendar days of receiving it.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have tax arrears.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must have at least one properly completed port quay construction or repair contract in the last 60 months.
--Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all tender document conditions.
--Bidders must submit the bid price according to the specified structure.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must have completed at least one port quay construction or repair contract in the last 60 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total value of the tender is 150,000.0 EUR.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

10 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
308135_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.3 KB

Bidders must confirm their offer complies with all tender document conditions, including submitting the bid price according to the structure, ensuring goods are not subject to sanctions, and meeting environmental requirements.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 308135... -- 45.9 KB

Bidders must submit completed contract data on Form Annex 3, proving at least one properly fulfilled port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.

Pakkuja peab lisaks täitma ka hankija ette antud vormi “Pakkumuse maksumuse tabe...XLS
Lisa 4 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel viitenr 3081... -- 33.0 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308135_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
308135_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.0 KB

Bidders must confirm they have no tax arrears and must have successfully completed at least one port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusZIP
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus VS kai 18 sein vii... -- 5.7 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektZIP
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt viitenr 308135.zi... -- 244.4 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimustele tuginem...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.3 KB

This document is a subcontractor's consent, confirming that the bidder may rely on the subcontractor's qualifications to participate in the tender.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 308135.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one joint bidder member to submit a bid on behalf of others for the Vanasadama Pier No. 18 old section wall repair works tender.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (väikehange RHR) VS kai 18 vana osa sein... -- 293.4 KB

This document presents a proposal for submitting a bid for the renovation works of the old section of Vanasadam pier no. 18, outlining general conditions, scope of work, deadlines, and bidder qualification requirements.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for pier repair works is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and improved accessibility of all technical documents.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal compliance procedures, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there is no indication of disputes. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', which could be more specific. Conditions are generally clear, though some document summaries are brief.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, some key technical documents (Lisa 1, Lisa 8, Lisa 9) are not fully accessible or analyzable by AI due to file format, impacting overall completeness assessment.

Some technical documents (Lisa 1, Lisa 8, Lisa 9) are not fully accessible or analyzable due to file format.
Reiluus85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. Criteria are objective, and value is disclosed. Deadlines are reasonable. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the duration is clear. Financing information is linked to the contract project. The contract duration is specified.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields are populated, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logical and sequential.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific social aspects or innovation focuses detailed in the provided information. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation.
Not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Vahvuudet

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Well-defined CPV code and procedure.
E-submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Huolenaiheet

Inaccessibility of some technical documents in AI analysis.
Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Suositukset

1. Ensure all technical documents are provided in an easily accessible and analyzable format.
2. Provide more specific details on sustainability goals, social criteria, and innovation aspects.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin