Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Pyöräily- ja kävelyinfrastruktuurin tietojen kartoitus ja järjestäminen

Avoin
Määräaika
12 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 27, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
307605
Arvo
€150,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 23, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid cost100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 23, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Toukokuu 26, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€150,000
Kesto
7 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€40,919
Keskim. tarjoukset
1.9
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
95%
495 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Pyöräily- ja kävelyinfrastruktuurin tietojen valtakunnallinen kartoitus ja järjestäminen hankinnan perusasiakirjoissa esitettyjen ehtojen mukaisesti.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for mapping and organizing cycling and walking infrastructure data is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive price while demonstrating robust technical capability in geoinformatics and GIS development, ensuring compliance with all mandatory and eligibility requirements.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-effective, high-quality data mapping and organization for enhanced mobility.

Leveraging expert geospatial and GIS capabilities for accurate and efficient data management.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Aggressive pricing due to the 100% cost weighting.
Demonstrating specialized technical expertise in geoinformatics and GIS development.
Streamlined submission process by ensuring all mandatory documents and confirmations are meticulously prepared.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings and efficiencies. Explore opportunities for process automation and lean operations. Consider strategic partnerships if they can lead to cost reductions without compromising quality.

Ensuring all mandatory and eligibility requirements are met precisely to avoid disqualification.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents, especially the Hankepass and CVs. Assign a dedicated compliance officer to oversee the bid preparation and submission.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A specialized geospatial data company with a proven track record in public sector projects, possessing a strong team of experienced geoinformaticians and GIS developers, and a highly efficient operational model that allows for aggressive pricing.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
CVs of geoinformaticians proving experience in spatial data processing and analysis related to transport infrastructure data.
CVs of GIS developers proving skills and experience in GIS databases, data processing automation, spatial data validation, and technical support for geoinformaticians.
Hankepass (enterprise's own confirmation) as initial proof of meeting the conditions set by the contracting authority.
Confirmation of agreement with the tender notice conditions.
Total bid cost (100% weight).
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrable efficiency in data processing and automation techniques that translate to lower costs without sacrificing accuracy.
A highly experienced and specialized team with a proven track record in similar public sector geospatial projects.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using local suppliers for any necessary hardware or software, or a plan for knowledge transfer to the contracting authority's staff, framed as an added value.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price that is still profitable and sustainable. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, identification of efficiencies, and potentially leveraging economies of scale. Every euro saved directly translates to a higher score.

Suositukset5
Aggressively Price for Cost Leadership
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weighting on total bid cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible viable price. Conduct a detailed cost-out exercise, identifying all direct and indirect costs, and explore all avenues for efficiency and cost reduction. This may involve optimizing workflows, leveraging existing technology, or negotiating favorable terms with suppliers.

Directly maximizes score for the most critical evaluation criterion.
Meticulously Prepare and Validate Hankepass and CVs
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure the Hankepass is completed accurately and comprehensively, serving as initial proof of meeting all conditions. The CVs for geoinformaticians and GIS developers must clearly highlight experience directly relevant to spatial data processing, transport infrastructure, GIS databases, and automation, as specified in the technical requirements. Any gaps in experience should be addressed with strong justifications or supporting documentation.

Prevents disqualification and demonstrates technical competence.
Develop a Robust Data Processing and Validation Methodology
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

While cost is paramount, the technical capability is still a mandatory requirement. Outline a clear, efficient, and scalable methodology for data mapping and organization. Emphasize automation in data processing and validation to showcase efficiency, which indirectly supports the cost-competitiveness.

Meets technical requirements and subtly reinforces cost-efficiency.
Highlight Automation and Efficiency in GIS Workflows
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Even without an explicit innovation requirement, showcasing how your GIS development team utilizes automation for data processing, validation, and quality control can be a subtle differentiator. This implies a more efficient operation, which can be linked to cost savings.

Positions the bidder as technologically advanced and efficient.
Establish a Strict Compliance and Quality Assurance Check
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Implement a multi-stage review process for all bid components, focusing on compliance with tender conditions, accuracy of information, and completeness of documentation. A dedicated compliance lead should oversee this to minimize the risk of errors or omissions that could lead to disqualification.

Minimizes risk of disqualification and ensures a high-quality submission.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the essential technical expertise required for accurate and efficient data mapping. Emphasize the value proposition of delivering high-quality results at the lowest possible price point.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

17 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (8)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (5)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bidders must mark and justify business secrets.
--Bidders must provide data of authorized persons.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender notice conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must meet the established qualification requirements.
--Bidders must submit bids only for the desired parts.
--Bidders must declare and justify business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit CVs of geoinformaticians proving their experience in spatial data processing and analysis related to transport infrastructure data.
--Bidders must submit CVs of GIS developers proving their skills and experience in GIS databases, data processing automation, spatial data validation, and technical support for geoinformaticians.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The evaluation criteria primarily focus on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

12 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
307605_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.6 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, submit bids only for requested parts, identify and justify trade secrets, and provide authorized person details.

Geoinformaatiku(te) CV(d)DOC
HD I Vorm 3-1 Meeskonnaliikme CV (geoinformaa... -- 33.3 KB

Bidders must submit CVs of geoinformation specialists demonstrating their experience in spatial data processing and analysis related to transport infrastructure data.

GIS-arendaja(te) CV(d)DOC
HD I Vorm 3-2 Meeskonnaliikme CV (GISarendaja... -- 33.2 KB

Bidders must submit CVs for GIS developers, demonstrating their skills and experience in GIS databases, data processing automation, spatial data validation, and technical support for geoinformatics professionals.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307605_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluation criteria primarily focus on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307605_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial proof of meeting the contracting authority's conditions, and is not intended for completion but for familiarization.

HD II Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD II Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 46.6 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract outlining the terms, annexes, and general requirements for the mapping and organization of cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data.

HD III lisa 1 Teeruumikujude kihtZIP
HD III lisa 1 Teeruumikujude kiht.zip -- 9.2 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

HD III lisa 2 Teeregistri imporditabelidXLS
HD III lisa 2 Teeregistri imporditabelid.xlsx -- 24.8 KB

This document outlines the structure and sample data for road register import tables, which must be completed for mapping cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data.

HD III lisa 3 Riiklikud andmekihidZIP
HD III lisa 3 Riiklikud andmekihid.zip -- 3.0 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

HD III Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD III Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 84.4 KB

The Transport Administration is seeking a contractor to map and organize nationwide data on cycling and walking infrastructure to ensure up-to-date information and support mobility policy development.

HD I VormidZIP
HD I Vormid.zip -- 43.6 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 32.9 KB

The Transport Administration is conducting a tender for mapping and organizing cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data, where bidders must meet established qualification requirements and submit their bids electronically.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for mapping cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a focus on cost-effectiveness. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some document formats are not machine-readable.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are noted.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview. Key criteria are specified, although the full extent of 'qualification requirements' would be detailed in the base document.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, some crucial documents (e.g., 'Riigihanke alusdokument') are marked as not required, which is unusual for a tender of this nature. The AI could not analyze certain file formats.

Key tender documents marked as not required.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation criteria are clearly stated as primarily cost-based with relative weighting. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competitive environment.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

Electronic submission is mandated, and a contract start date is provided. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration, while specified, includes a period for acceptance which could extend the actual execution time.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. The tender is active and not suspended, and there are no noted disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green or social procurement criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear description of services required.
Electronic submission and e-procurement process.
Cost-based evaluation criteria with relative weighting.
Well-defined timeline and contract duration.

Huolenaiheet

Key tender documents marked as not required.
Some document formats not machine-readable by AI.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Suositukset

1. Clarify the status and necessity of all documents listed in the tender.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.
3. Ensure all tender documents are in machine-readable formats where possible.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin