Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Saku kunnan laitosten rakennus- ja remonttityöt 2026

Suljettu
Määräaika
0 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 15, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
307555
Arvo
€150,100
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 19, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total cost of works100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 19, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 08, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Toukokuu 31, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€150,100
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Ehitusremonttööde teostamine Saku Vallavalitsuse allasutuste hoonetes: 1. Lasteaed Päikesekild, Saku Teaduse 14 2. Lasteaed Terake, Saku Tallinna mnt 12, Pargi 27, Juubelitammede tee 6 3. Kajamaa Kool, Saku Kooli tee 1 4. Kurtna Kool, Kurtna küla Kurtna tee 50 5. Saku Päästekeskus, Saku Päästekeskuse tee 1 6. Kiisa Vabaajakeskus, Kiisa Kurtna tee 8 7. Saku Päevakeskus, Saku Juubelitammede tee 6 8. Saku Valla avalikud mänguväljakud 9. Saku Muusikakool, Saku Tallinna mnt 10 10. Saku Gümnaasium Algkool, Saku Tallinna mnt 10 11. Saku Tervisekeskus, Saku Tiigi 19 12. Saku Noortekeskus, Saku Uus Saku 3a
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender prioritizes price above all else, making aggressive cost management and a highly competitive bid essential. While social value and innovation are not explicitly weighted, demonstrating efficiency and reliability through past performance and a clear execution plan will be crucial for securing this contract.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality construction and renovation services at the most competitive price.

Reliable Execution: Ensuring timely and efficient project completion across all Saku Municipality facilities.

Transparent Partnership: Proactive communication and clear documentation throughout the project lifecycle.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Dominance in price evaluation due to 100% weighting.
Potential to leverage existing relationships or local presence in Saku Municipality.
Opportunity to showcase efficiency and streamlined processes through the detailed cost breakdown.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, and explore efficient construction methodologies to offer the lowest possible price without compromising quality.

Managing multiple, diverse sites with varying renovation needs.

Develop a detailed project management plan that accounts for the specific requirements of each facility, ensuring efficient resource allocation and scheduling.

Potential for unforeseen issues during site inspections or renovations.

Include contingency planning in the cost breakdown and project schedule. Ensure clear communication channels with the contracting authority for prompt issue resolution.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A construction and renovation company with a proven track record in public sector projects, particularly educational and community facilities. The ideal bidder possesses strong cost control capabilities, efficient project management, and a robust supply chain to ensure competitive pricing. Experience with multiple, geographically dispersed sites is also beneficial.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Detailed cost breakdown and quantity table (Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx)
Confirmation of compliance with qualification requirements via Hankepass
Familiarization with the object
Electronic submission by the deadline
Subcontractor background checks and explanations
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrably the lowest price, achieved through optimized processes and supply chain management.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that instills confidence in value for money.
A clear and concise project execution plan that highlights efficiency and minimal disruption to facility operations.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities as a value-add, even if not directly scored. This can be framed as a commitment to the Saku community.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total cost of works100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest price possible by meticulously detailing all costs, optimizing resource allocation, and leveraging bulk purchasing power. Ensure the cost breakdown is clear, justifiable, and directly addresses the scope of works for each listed facility.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weighting on total cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price. This requires meticulous cost analysis, efficient procurement, and optimized labor planning. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising essential quality standards.

Directly maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Master the Cost Breakdown (Vorm 1)
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

The 'Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx' is paramount. It must be exceptionally detailed, accurate, and transparent, clearly itemizing costs for each object. Ensure it aligns perfectly with the technical specifications and demonstrates a deep understanding of the scope.

Crucial for meeting technical requirements and demonstrating competence, directly influencing price perception.
Conduct Thorough Site Familiarization
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

The requirement to familiarize oneself with the objects is explicit. Undertake detailed site visits to all listed facilities to accurately assess existing conditions, identify potential challenges, and refine cost estimates. Document these visits.

Reduces risk of underestimation, improves bid accuracy, and demonstrates commitment.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

While not explicitly scored, subtly emphasize your company's ability to execute projects efficiently and with minimal disruption to the daily operations of educational and community facilities. This can be woven into the technical description or project execution plan.

Builds confidence in the contracting authority regarding project continuity and reliability.
Proactive Subcontractor Vetting
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors. Ensure all subcontractors are pre-vetted by your company for criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking. Have all necessary documentation and explanations ready to submit.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues and demonstrates responsible procurement practices.
Ensure Flawless Electronic Submission
KriittinenMatala vaiva

Adhere strictly to all electronic submission requirements and the deadline. Double-check all uploaded documents for completeness and correct formatting to avoid any last-minute technical issues.

Ensures the bid is formally accepted and considered.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on the essential quality and reliability required for public facilities. Emphasize a streamlined, efficient approach to project delivery that translates directly into savings for the municipality.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

12 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (6)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (2)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--The bid must include information on the terms of the contract, technical description, and grounds for bid rejection.
--The bid must specify the cost of the works.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds may apply based on the ESPD and other documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must confirm compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements via the Hankepass (electronic confirmation).
--Joint bidders require a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must provide a cost breakdown and quantity table (Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx) detailing the cost of construction and renovation works, including specific object descriptions like Lasteaed Päikesekild.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors for criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the works will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

8 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307555_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307555_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.2 KB

The tender document clarifies requirements for joint bidder authorization, declaration of trade secrets, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and site visit confirmation.

Vorm 1 kululoend ja mahutabel.XLS
Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx -- 53.0 KB

The bidder must submit a cost breakdown and quantity table detailing the costs of construction and renovation works for Saku Municipality's sub-institutions, including descriptions of work for specific sites like Päikesekild Kindergarten.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307555_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates bids based on the total cost of works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307555_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is filled out electronically.

Hankelepingu projektPDF
Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 164.2 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms and conditions for construction and renovation works, specifying the objects, payment, and deadlines for works at Saku Municipality's subordinate institutions.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 275.0 KB

This document is a proposal for submitting a bid, outlining the tender procedure's conditions, formatting, and submission, along with information on contract terms, technical specifications, and bid rejection.

Tehnilise kirjelduse lisadZIP
Tehn_kirjeldus_ lisad.zip -- 35.7 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for construction and renovation works at Saku Municipality's subordinate institutions is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of submission could be improved.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance standards, including proper CPV code and clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated as attached to the tender documents.

Selkeys80/100

The description of works is clear, listing all specific locations. Requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting based on total cost. Conditions for bid submission and subcontractor checks are outlined.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the specific duration of the contract is not explicitly stated, only the tender validity period. The financing condition is linked to attached documents, which is acceptable but could be more directly stated.

Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, with full document access implied. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is linked to attached documents. However, the specific duration of the contract is missing, impacting full practicality.

Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Vahvuudet

Clear description of works and locations
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value

Huolenaiheet

Contract duration not explicitly stated
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Some document formats not AI-analyzable (e.g., .zip)

Suositukset

1. Explicitly state the contract duration.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation or requirements.
3. Ensure all relevant documents are in AI-analyzable formats where possible.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin