Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Kohilan kylän perhepuiston rakennustyöt, vaihe 2

Suljettu
Määräaika
0 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 15, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
307467
Arvo
€137,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 23, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid cost100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 23, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 08, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€137,000
Kesto
4 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Hankitaan Kohilan kylän perhepuiston rakennustyöt, vaihe 2, johon kuuluvat verkkopyramidialueen, interaktiivisten leikkivälineiden ja ulkokuntosalin rakentaminen.
EU-rahoitteinenSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for Kohila alevi family park's 2nd stage construction is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while ensuring meticulous adherence to all technical and submission requirements. Given the lack of emphasis on social value or innovation, cost optimization and robust project management are paramount.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for Kohila alevi family park's 2nd stage construction.

Reliable and efficient delivery of high-quality park amenities, meeting all technical specifications.

A straightforward and transparent bidding process, demonstrating full understanding of tender requirements.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Dominant focus on price (100% evaluation weight) allows for a clear competitive advantage if the lowest bid is achieved.
The tender is not divided into parts, allowing for a single, comprehensive bid that can be streamlined for cost efficiency.
The absence of explicit green or social value requirements simplifies bid preparation, allowing focus on core cost and technical aspects.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation, requiring aggressive cost optimization without compromising quality or compliance.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, explore efficient construction methods, and negotiate favorable terms with suppliers. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness.

Strict adherence to submission formats and documentation (e.g., Hankepass, Vorm 2, Vorm 3) can lead to disqualification if not meticulously followed.

Dedicate resources to carefully review and complete all forms. Utilize checklists and conduct internal reviews to ensure all documentation is accurate, complete, and in the correct format.

Potential for penalties as outlined in the draft contract (Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx) if project timelines or quality standards are not met.

Develop a realistic and achievable project plan with buffer times. Implement robust quality control measures throughout the construction process.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A construction company with proven experience in public park infrastructure and playground installations, possessing strong cost control capabilities and efficient project execution processes. They must be adept at navigating tender documentation and meeting strict submission deadlines and formats.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Submission of initial cost statement (Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx) detailing construction costs both excluding and including VAT.
Confirmation of compliance with conditions and provision of data using Form 2 Osalemise taotlus_293619.docx.
Adherence to conditions and requirements described in the tender basis document (Hanke alusdokument.docx).
Submission of bidder's own confirmation (Hankepass) in the specified format.
Detailed technical specification compliance for net pyramid and interactive play structure (Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
Subcontractor background checks for criminal convictions (fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing).
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrating a clear understanding of the cost-evaluation mechanism and presenting a bid that is demonstrably the lowest compliant offer.
Exceptional attention to detail in completing all required forms and documentation, minimizing any risk of administrative disqualification.
A concise and clear technical proposal that directly addresses the requirements of Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx, showcasing efficient execution.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a brief mention of local employment or waste reduction during construction as a subtle value-add, if it doesn't increase cost.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible compliant bid. This requires rigorous cost engineering, efficient resource allocation, and potentially leveraging economies of scale. Ensure all costs are accurately reflected in Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx, both excluding and including VAT.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Optimize Bid Price
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weight on cost, every effort must be made to submit the lowest possible compliant bid. This involves detailed cost breakdown, efficient material sourcing, and optimized labor deployment. Ensure Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx is meticulously prepared.

Directly impacts the bid's score and likelihood of winning.
Meticulous Documentation Compliance
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly review and complete all required forms (Form 2, Hankepass, Vorm 3) and adhere strictly to the formats specified in Hanke alusdokument.docx and vastavustingimused.pdf. Any deviation can lead to disqualification.

Prevents administrative disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Demonstrate Technical Capability Clearly
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Ensure Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx is fully understood and addressed. The bid should clearly articulate how the net pyramid and interactive play structure will be installed to meet specifications, even if not a primary evaluation criterion.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute and avoids potential issues during contract execution.
Proactive Subcontractor Due Diligence
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing. Obtain necessary explanations and evidence of reliability as required.

Mitigates exclusion grounds and ensures compliance with mandatory requirements.
Review Draft Contract for Penalties
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Carefully analyze Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx to understand all contractor obligations and penalty clauses. Develop a project plan that minimizes the risk of incurring penalties.

Reduces financial risk and ensures successful contract completion.
Consider Subtle Value-Adds (if cost-neutral)
MatalaMatala vaiva

While not evaluated, a brief mention of local employment or sustainable waste management practices during construction could be a minor positive signal if it doesn't impact the bid price.

Marginal positive impression, no direct scoring impact.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous and compliant offer, emphasizing efficiency and a straightforward approach. Highlight the company's ability to deliver the project within budget and on time, meeting all technical specifications without unnecessary complexity.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

12 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (5)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (3)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must adhere to the conditions and requirements for participation in the tender procedure as described in the tender basis document (Hanke alusdokument.docx).
--The tender requires the submission of a bidder's own confirmation (Hankepass) as initial evidence, in the format specified by the contracting authority.
--Specific requirements regarding joint bids, trade secrets, submission conditions, cost, and equivalence are detailed in the document "vastavustingimused.pdf".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority may exclude economic operators who have been convicted of offenses such as fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, as stated in the conditions for checking subcontractors.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions and provide their data using Form 2 Osalemise taotlus_293619.docx.
--Joint bids require a Power of Attorney (Vorm 1_ Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx) authorizing one party to represent all.
--The tender is not divided into parts, requiring a comprehensive solution for quality and coordinated results.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The subject of the contract is the construction works for the 2nd stage of Kohila alevi family park, including the installation of a net pyramid area and an interactive play structure, as per the technical specification (Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit an initial cost statement (Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx) detailing construction costs for different stages, both excluding and including VAT.
--The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on the total cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

10 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307467_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307467_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.6 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bids, trade secrets, bid submission conditions, cost, and equivalency, necessary for participating in the Kohila village park 2nd phase construction tender.

Vorm 2. Osalemise taotlusDOC
Vorm 2 Osalemise taotlus_293619.docx -- 12.0 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender, where the bidder confirms compliance with conditions and provides their details.

Vorm 3. Maksumuse esildisXLS
Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 17.5 KB

The contracting authority requires the bidder to submit an initial cost estimate detailing the cost of construction works for different stages, both excluding and including VAT.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307467_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307467_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.8 KB

The tender passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 17.1 KB

This document outlines the tender procedures and requirements for the construction works of the 2nd phase of Kohila village family park, which bidders must comply with.

Lisa 1. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 2.9 MB

This document is the draft contract for the Kohila village family park's 2nd stage construction works, outlining contract terms, contractor obligations, and penalty clauses.

Lisa 2. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 1.7 MB

The subject of the tender is the construction works for the 2nd stage of Kohila village family park, including the installation of a net pyramid area and an interactive play device according to the provided technical specification.

Vorm 1. VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1_ Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 12.4 KB

This power of attorney is required for joint bids to authorize one party to represent all parties in the tender procedure and contract signing.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for the Kohila family park construction is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific provisions for sustainability and could improve in terms of e-submission practicality.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. The 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: A' codes suggest a standard open procedure.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. Key documents like the technical specification and contract draft are referenced, contributing to clarity. Evaluation criteria are specified.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents such as the technical specification, contract draft, and submission forms are available. However, the 'Required: No' status for some important documents like the technical specification and contract draft is a minor concern for completeness.

Some crucial documents (Technical Specification, Contract Draft) are marked as 'Required: No'.
Reiluus85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access and disclosure of value. The evaluation criteria, primarily based on the lowest price, are objective. The use of e-procurement and standard forms enhances accessibility. No specific company tailoring was detected.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which is positive. However, the reliance on specific document formats (e.g., .docx, .xlsx) and the lack of a direct URL for all required documents might slightly reduce practicality for some bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Reliance on specific document formats might pose minor usability challenges.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status '11' is consistent with an active tender.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which limits the sustainability score.

No specific green procurement criteria.
No explicit social or innovation aspects mentioned.

Vahvuudet

Clear and well-defined scope of work.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.
Objective evaluation criteria focused on price.
Use of e-procurement platform.

Huolenaiheet

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Some key documents marked as not required.
Contract start date not specified.

Suositukset

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria into the evaluation process.
2. Clearly state the contract start date.
3. Ensure all essential documents are marked as required for submission.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin