Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Sisäisen turvallisuuden akatemian (Kase 61, Tallinna) taktiikkarakennuksen rakennustyöt

Avoin
Määräaika
1 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 16, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
307456
Arvo
€2,360,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 12, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total cost of works excluding VAT100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 12, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 09, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 16, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 07, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€2,360,000
Kesto
14 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Hankinnan tavoitteena on löytää rakennustöiden pääurakoitsija, joka rekonstruoi ja uudistaa Sisäisen turvallisuuden akatemian nykyisen liikuntarakennuksen opetustilaksi. Edellä mainitun lisäksi on tarpeen rakentaa rakennuksen käyttöön tarvittavat tekniset verkot, tiet, alueet ja viherrakentaminen urakoitsijan toimeksiannon ja suunnittelutyön lähtötietojen mukaisesti.
Vihreä hankintaSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

70%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building construction is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost optimization, demonstrating robust project management capabilities, and meticulous adherence to all mandatory requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly evaluated, demonstrating a commitment to quality and timely delivery will be crucial.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Delivering exceptional value through optimized cost and efficient execution.

Ensuring project success with a highly qualified and experienced team.

Commitment to quality and timely completion of the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost evaluation.
Demonstrating strong project management and technical expertise through CVs.
Leveraging existing relationships with reliable subcontractors for cost-effective delivery.
Proactive engagement with the contracting authority for clarifications on technical specifications.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost savings, and explore efficient construction methods. Negotiate favorable terms with suppliers and subcontractors. Consider lean construction principles.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements, including forms and documentation, are perfectly completed.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents. Assign dedicated personnel to manage bid preparation and quality control. Utilize checklists based on tender requirements.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or technical complexities in the reconstruction.

Conduct a thorough site visit and risk assessment. Include contingency in the cost proposal for potential issues. Clearly define scope and responsibilities in the contract.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
An experienced general contractor with a proven track record in public sector construction projects, particularly educational or institutional buildings. The ideal bidder will possess strong cost control mechanisms, a highly qualified and experienced project team, and efficient subcontractor management capabilities. They should also have a clear understanding of Estonian construction regulations and standards.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Lowest total cost of offer excluding VAT
Project manager, site manager, strong current specialist, and fire and alarm system specialist CVs (Form 4)
Completion of Form 2 and Form 3
Subcontractor data submission
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Background checks for employees on site
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects within budget and ahead of schedule.
Innovative approaches to construction methodology that reduce costs or improve efficiency, even if not explicitly evaluated.
Strong client references from similar public sector projects.
A highly experienced and stable project team with a proven track record on complex builds.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly evaluated, consider including a statement on commitment to local employment and skills development during the project lifecycle. This can be a subtle differentiator and align with broader public sector objectives.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total cost of works excluding VAT100.0%

Develop a highly competitive and detailed cost breakdown. Identify all opportunities for cost reduction through efficient design, material sourcing, and construction methods. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accurately accounted for, with a lean profit margin to be the lowest bidder.

Suositukset6
Aggressive Cost Optimization
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% cost evaluation, every effort must be made to submit the lowest possible price while ensuring profitability and quality. This involves detailed cost engineering, efficient supply chain management, and lean construction practices.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Meticulous Form and Documentation Completion
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure Forms 2, 3, and 4 are completed accurately and comprehensively, with no omissions or errors. Pay close attention to subcontractor data and the distinction of trade secrets as per requirements.

Avoids disqualification and demonstrates attention to detail.
Demonstrate Project Team Qualifications
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Submit high-quality CVs for the project manager, site manager, and specialists that clearly highlight their relevant experience and qualifications, aligning with the project's technical requirements.

Meets a key technical capability requirement and builds confidence in execution.
Proactive Risk Management and Contingency Planning
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

While not explicitly evaluated, a well-articulated approach to identifying and mitigating project risks, including a realistic contingency plan, can instill confidence in the contracting authority regarding project delivery.

Enhances perceived reliability and professionalism.
Thorough Site Visit and Technical Clarification
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Conduct a comprehensive site visit to understand the existing conditions and potential challenges. Actively seek clarifications on the technical description (Lisa 1) to ensure a precise and cost-effective bid.

Reduces the risk of cost overruns and improves bid accuracy.
Subtle Social Value Messaging
MatalaMatala vaiva

Integrate a brief statement about commitment to local employment, sustainability practices (e.g., waste reduction), or community engagement within the bid narrative, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.

Aligns with broader public procurement goals and can be a subtle positive differentiator.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the quality and timely delivery of the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building. Emphasize the strength and experience of the project team as a guarantee of successful execution.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

24 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (10)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (8)
Tekninen (3)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bidders must submit an offer following the contracting authority's conditions.
--Subcontractor data must be provided.
--Trade secrets must be distinguished.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Background checks will be performed on the successful bidder's employees before they are allowed on site.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must submit an offer in accordance with the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must provide subcontractor data.
--Bidders must distinguish trade secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Project manager, site manager, strong current specialist, and fire and alarm system specialist CVs must be submitted (Form 4).
--CVs for the project manager, site manager, and specialists must be submitted (Form 4).
--The technical description defines the scope, requirements, and basis documents for the construction works, including the process for preparing and approving the construction and work project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender will be evaluated based on the total cost of the offer excluding VAT, with the lowest price being the best.
--Bidders must submit Form 3, which includes a detailed cost table for the different stages of construction work.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

12 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307456_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing before contract execution.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307456_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 17.1 KB

Bidders must submit a bid adhering to the contracting authority's conditions, providing subcontractor data, distinguishing trade secrets, and completing Forms 2 and 3, including the required project manager qualifications.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2 1203.docx -- 19.0 KB

Form 2 is an application for participation in the tender procedure, confirming the bid's compliance with all conditions and requirements, including those regarding subcontractors and trade secrets.

Vorm 3XLS
VORM 3_Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel (1203).xlsx -- 35.8 KB

The bidder must submit Form 3, which includes a detailed cost breakdown table for various stages of construction work.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1203).docx -- 18.4 KB

The tender requires the submission of Form 4, which includes CVs for the project manager, site manager, and specialists to assess their qualifications.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1203).docx -- 18.4 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of CVs for the project manager, site manager, low-voltage specialist, and fire and alarm system specialist on Form 4.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8 (1203).docx -- 13.7 KB

Form 8 is a joint bid authorization letter, empowering one bidder to represent other participants in a joint bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307456_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.7 KB

The tender evaluates the total cost of works without VAT, where the lowest price is the best.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307456_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format of bidder responses.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek (1... -- 46.7 KB

This document provides instructions for submitting a bid for the tender 'Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building construction works', including electronic submission requirements and procedures for accessing the technical description.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_2025 (1... -- 415.6 KB

This technical specification defines the scope, requirements, and foundational documents for the construction works of the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building, including the construction project and the process of developing and approving the work project.

Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt (1203).docx -- 143.0 KB

This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific terms, including contractor and client details, project and site information, and penalty clauses.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building construction works is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer guidance on accessing restricted documents.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are specified, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are indicated. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance and fairness.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the reconstruction and new construction of technical networks, roads, and landscaping. Key requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified. However, the access to 'restricted information' in the base documents could be clearer.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications, contract drafts, and various forms are listed. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' might imply some financial details are not fully disclosed, impacting completeness.

Reiluus85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is based on relative weighting, with price being a key factor. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a good practice. The requirement for background checks on employees is a specific but justifiable measure for this type of facility.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Contract start date is presumptive and has no legal significance' might create some ambiguity for bidders planning resources. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Contract start date presumptive
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there is no explicit detail on how this will be evaluated or what specific green criteria will be applied. Social aspects and innovation are not clearly defined.

Lack of specific green procurement details
No explicit social or innovation criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear project description and scope
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' for standards
Detailed list of required forms and CVs

Huolenaiheet

Ambiguity regarding access to restricted information
Presumptive contract start date
Lack of specific details on sustainability criteria

Suositukset

1. Provide clearer instructions or a separate document detailing how to access restricted information.
2. Clarify the implications of the presumptive contract start date for bidders.
3. Elaborate on the specific criteria and evaluation methods for 'Green Procurement'.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin