Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Saarlasõ-padon purkaminen, uoman ennallistaminen ja sillan rakentaminen

Avoin
Määräaika
5 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 20, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
307182
Arvo
€350,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 11, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid cost100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 11, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 13, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 08, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Huhtikuu 30, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€350,000
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Saarlasõ-padon purkaminen, uoman ennallistaminen ja sillan rakentaminen
EU-rahoitteinenSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost management and demonstrating absolute compliance with mandatory requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly evaluated, a strong emphasis on efficient project delivery and risk mitigation will be crucial for securing this contract.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Unbeatable Price for Integrated River Restoration and Bridge Construction

Guaranteed Compliance and Risk-Free Project Delivery

Efficient and Localized Expertise for Saarlasõ Project

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Sole evaluation criterion is total bid cost (100%)
Mandatory site visit allows for detailed cost estimation and identification of efficiencies
No explicit requirements for social value or innovation allows focus on core cost and technical delivery
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting

Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis of all project components, explore all possible efficiencies in labor, materials, and equipment. Leverage existing long-term supplier relationships for potential discounts. Consider lean construction methodologies.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting costs

Thorough site visit is paramount. Engage experienced engineers to review the project plans (Lisa 1-1 Projekt) for potential risks. Build a small contingency into the bid price, but ensure it remains competitive.

Strict exclusion grounds regarding Russian Federation connections

Proactively vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers early in the bidding process. Obtain written declarations from all parties confirming no Russian Federation connections. Maintain clear documentation of this vetting process.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with proven experience in riverbed restoration, dam liquidation, and bridge construction, possessing a highly efficient operational model and a strong understanding of local conditions in EE. The ideal bidder will have a lean cost structure and a robust supply chain that avoids any Russian Federation connections.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Mandatory site visit to the object
No subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation
Submission of cost using the provided price offer form
Compliance with tender documents and technical specifications
Subcontractor checks for criminal convictions
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated ability to achieve the lowest possible cost through operational excellence and efficient project management, rather than simply cutting corners.
A clear and concise presentation of the bid, highlighting cost-effectiveness and compliance, making it easy for the contracting authority to evaluate.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential risks during the site visit, presented within the bid.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not evaluated, consider a statement of commitment to local employment where feasible, framing it as an efficiency measure for project execution rather than a social value add. This could be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not mention it.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price through meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and leveraging any available economies of scale. Ensure the price offer form is completed accurately and without errors. Understand the scoring formula to maximize points.

Suositukset6
Mandatory Site Visit and Detailed Costing
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Conduct an exhaustive site visit to fully understand the scope of dam liquidation, riverbed restoration, and bridge construction. Use this detailed understanding to create a highly accurate and competitive cost estimate, identifying any potential cost-saving opportunities.

Ensures accurate pricing, minimizes risk of cost overruns, and allows for aggressive pricing.
Aggressive Cost Optimization
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% cost weighting, every effort must be made to reduce the bid price. This includes optimizing labor, material sourcing, equipment utilization, and construction methods. Explore lean construction principles and efficient project sequencing.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Rigorous Vetting for Russian Federation Connections
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Implement a strict due diligence process for all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure no connections to the Russian Federation. Obtain written confirmations and maintain clear records of this vetting process to avoid mandatory exclusion.

Prevents disqualification from the tender.
Clarity and Precision in Submission
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Ensure all documentation, especially the price offer form, is completed with absolute accuracy and clarity. A well-organized and easy-to-understand submission can subtly influence the perception of competence and reduce administrative queries.

Minimizes risk of errors leading to disqualification or negative perception.
Review Contract Draft (Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt)
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly review the draft contract to understand all obligations, including work safety and PPE. Identify any potential cost implications or contractual risks that need to be factored into the bid price.

Prevents unforeseen contractual issues and cost increases post-award.
Subcontractor Criminal Conviction Checks
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Establish a clear process for checking subcontractors for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, as required. This needs to be documented.

Ensures compliance with mandatory requirements and avoids exclusion.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on essential technical requirements. Emphasize efficiency and a lean operational model as the drivers of this competitive pricing. Highlight the bidder's understanding of the local context (EE) as a factor in efficient execution.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

10 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (3)
Pakollinen (2)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (2)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted in the specified format.
--Information regarding trade secrets must be provided.
--The tender is for a single, integrated object and has not been divided into lots for economic and organizational reasons.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Subcontractors must be checked for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must comply with the tender documents and technical specifications.
--Prior site visit to the object is mandatory.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender covers liquidation of the Saarlasõ dam, riverbed restoration, and bridge construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
--Bidders must submit the cost of the bid using the provided price offer form.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

9 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307182_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking first-tier subcontractors regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307182_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

The bidder must confirm that subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation are not involved in the contract execution and provide information on trade secrets.

Lisa 1 Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1_Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Saarlasõ pais.xlsx -- 24.3 KB

Appendix 1 of the tender documents is a price offer form where the cost of the bid for the liquidation of the Saarlasõ dam, riverbed restoration, and bridge construction works must be submitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307182_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Tenders will be evaluated solely on their total cost, with the lowest bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307182_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.2 KB

The tender pass, with additional clarifications, outlines the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format of bidder responses, but is not intended for direct completion.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument_Saarlasõ pais .docx -- 25.3 KB

This public procurement covers the liquidation of the Saarlasõ dam, riverbed restoration, and bridge construction, requiring bidders to comply with tender documents and technical specifications.

Lisa 1-1 ProjektZIP
Lisa 1-1 Saarlasõ projekt, joonised.zip -- 20.3 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Lisa 2 Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt Saarlasõ.docx -- 57.6 KB

This document is a draft of the contractor agreement, outlining the contract terms, appendices, and party obligations, including work safety and personal protective equipment requirements.

Lisa 3 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 3- Tehniline kirjeldus_Saarlasõ pais.doc... -- 52.7 KB

The contracting authority seeks bids for the liquidation of the Saarlasõ dam, riverbed restoration, and bridge construction, with mandatory prior site inspection required.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for dam liquidation, riverbed restoration, and bridge construction is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document accessibility.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is indicated as 'A' (Open procedure), which is standard. No immediate legal disputes or compliance issues are flagged.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are detailed. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the total cost, ensuring clarity for bidders on how their offers will be assessed. The mandatory site visit adds to the clarity of expectations.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the AI could not analyze all attached documents due to format limitations (XML, ZIP), potentially hiding some crucial details. The number of documents (10) is substantial, suggesting a good level of detail.

Inability to analyze all document formats (.xml, .zip) may hide critical information.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, with a single evaluation criterion (lowest price) which is objective. The requirement for a prior site visit is standard for such projects. The exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a geopolitical consideration rather than a company-specific tailoring. E-submission is mandated.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is required, which is positive. However, the AI could not access URLs for all documents, and the reliance on specific file formats for some key documents (ESPD, Project files) might pose practical challenges for bidders if not easily accessible or compatible with their systems. The contract start date is specified.

Potential accessibility issues with certain document formats (.xml, .zip) for bidders.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The timeline appears logical, with a reasonable period between the reveal date and the submission deadline.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded, this is a funding characteristic rather than a sustainability requirement embedded in the tender's objectives. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear technical description and scope of work.
Objective and straightforward evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory site visit ensures bidder understanding.
EU funded project.

Huolenaiheet

Limited visibility into certain document formats (.xml, .zip).
Absence of explicit sustainability or innovation requirements.
Potential practical challenges with specific document formats for bidders.

Suositukset

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria in future tenders to align with broader policy goals.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin