Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

SA Viljandi sairaalan hissien ja nostolaitteiden huoltotyöt 2026-2029

Suljettu
Määräaika
0 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 16, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
307033
Arvo
€60,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 16, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Cost of the bid100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 16, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 09, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 16, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 13, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€60,000
Kesto
36 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€265,238
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.7
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
90%
843 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Hankinnan tarkoituksena on SA Viljandi sairaalalle kuuluvien hissien, nostolaitteiden, invahissien sekä varastointi- ja valmistelujärjestelmien huoltotyöt.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

70%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for lift and lifting equipment maintenance is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive pricing while demonstrating robust technical capability and adherence to all mandatory requirements. Given the low estimated value and lack of complex evaluation criteria, a streamlined, cost-efficient bid is paramount.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

The most cost-effective and reliable partner for SA Viljandi Haigla's essential lift and lifting equipment maintenance.

Ensuring uninterrupted hospital operations through proactive and responsive maintenance services.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Aggressive pricing due to 100% cost weighting.
Demonstrating operational efficiency to justify low costs.
Leveraging existing local infrastructure and technician availability to minimize overheads.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore economies of scale if the bidder has other contracts in the region. Consider a slightly lower profit margin than usual if financially viable.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements are met precisely, as there are no explicit provisions for clarification or amendment.

Conduct a meticulous review of all tender documents, including the draft contract (Lisa 1), to ensure full compliance. Double-check all forms and declarations before submission.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with a strong local presence in Estonia, specializing in lift and lifting equipment maintenance. This bidder should have a proven track record of reliable service, efficient operations allowing for competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the specific equipment listed in the tender. They must also have a robust system for 24/7 customer service and electronic management software.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Submission of Form 3 (Cost Proposal) with accurate pricing for 2026-2029.
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Provision of 24/7 customer service.
Use of electronic management software for maintenance.
Submission of Form 2 (Request for Participation) and Vorm 1 (Power of Attorney) if applicable.
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
A highly competitive and transparent pricing structure that clearly outlines value for money.
Demonstrated experience with similar hospital or healthcare facility equipment maintenance, highlighting understanding of critical operational needs.
A proactive maintenance plan that goes beyond the minimum requirements, suggesting a commitment to preventing issues before they arise.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly requested, a commitment to employing local technicians and providing training opportunities for them can be subtly highlighted as a benefit to the community, even if not formally scored.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Cost of the bid100.0%

Submit the absolute lowest viable price. This requires meticulous cost breakdown and identification of all possible efficiencies. Ensure Form 3 is filled accurately and completely, with no ambiguity in pricing.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price that is still sustainable. Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis to determine the absolute lowest acceptable bid.

Directly maximizes score for the evaluation criterion.
Verify Russian Federation Sanctions Compliance
KriittinenMatala vaiva

Strictly ensure no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation are used. This is a mandatory exclusion ground. Document this compliance internally.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Confirm 24/7 Service Capability
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Clearly state the availability of 24/7 customer service and provide details on how this will be managed (e.g., on-call technicians, response times).

Meets a key technical capability requirement.
Detail Electronic Management Software Usage
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Specify the electronic management software to be used and briefly explain its benefits for efficient maintenance tracking and reporting.

Meets a key technical capability requirement and demonstrates operational efficiency.
Thorough Review of Draft Contract (Lisa 1)
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Scrutinize the draft contract (Lisa 1) for any hidden obligations, onerous terms, or potential cost implications not immediately apparent. Ensure full understanding of the contract's scope, duration, and payment terms.

Prevents future disputes and financial risks.
Highlight Local Expertise and Responsiveness
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Emphasize the bidder's local presence in Estonia and their ability to provide rapid response times due to proximity, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.

Builds confidence and suggests operational advantages.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, backed by a commitment to reliable and efficient service. Avoid any suggestion of cutting corners to achieve the low price; instead, frame it as a result of optimized operations and local presence.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

24 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (10)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (7)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit Form 3 (Cost Proposal).
--Bidders must submit Form 2 (Request for Participation).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide information regarding trade secrets.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with the conditions set by the contracting authority.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Service provider must offer 24/7 customer service.
--Service provider must perform regular maintenance.
--Service provider must carry out fault repairs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 60,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit Form 3, detailing the cost of maintenance works for elevators and lifting equipment for 2026-2029, filling in the green cells.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

10 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
307033_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

The bidder must confirm the exclusion of subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, provide information on trade secrets, and submit a power of attorney if it's a joint bid.

Vorm 2- Osalemise taotlusDOC
Vorm 2 Osalemise taotlus.docx -- 12.0 KB

This form is part of the tender submission application for the maintenance of elevators and lifting equipment at SA Viljandi Haigla, where the bidder confirms compliance with conditions and provides their details.

Vorm 3. Pakkumuse maksumuse esildisXLS
Vorm 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 15.4 KB

Bidders must submit Form 3, detailing the cost of lift and lifting equipment maintenance for the years 2026-2029, by filling in the green cells.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307033_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307033_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.7 KB

The Procurement Pass (Hankepass) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument - liftid ja tõsteseadmed.d... -- 14.0 KB

This foundational document outlines the general terms and conditions for submitting a bid for the maintenance of elevators and lifting equipment for SA Viljandi Haigla, including formatting requirements and legal acts.

Lisa 1. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Hankeleping liftid ja tõsteseadmed.doc... -- 21.4 KB

This draft tender contract outlines the terms, duration, payment, and integral parts of the maintenance contract for SA Viljandi Haigla's elevators and lifting equipment.

Lisa 2.1. Seadmete nimekiri ja aadressidXLS
Lisa 21 Seadmete nimekiri ja aadressid.xlsx -- 9.8 KB

This document lists the details of elevators and lifting equipment owned by Viljandi Hospital, including their locations, types, factory designations, and maintenance frequencies, essential for the 2026-2029 maintenance works tender.

Lisa 2. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 13.6 KB

Viljandi Hospital is seeking a service provider for the maintenance of elevators, lifting equipment, and stairlifts from 2026-2029, requiring 24/7 customer service, regular maintenance, fault resolution, and the use of electronic management software.

Vorm 1. VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx -- 11.4 KB

This power of attorney confirms the bidder's representative's right to conclude and fulfill the contract within the scope of the SA Viljandi Haigla elevator and lifting equipment maintenance tender.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for lift and lifting equipment maintenance is generally well-structured with clear requirements, though some aspects could be improved regarding practicality and sustainability.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with a clear CPV code, reasonable deadlines, and adherence to standard e-procurement procedures. No major disputes or regulatory issues are apparent. The inclusion of mandatory exclusion grounds related to geopolitical factors is a notable, though not uncommon, aspect of current procurement.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the services required is clear and specific, detailing the scope of maintenance for elevators, lifting equipment, and stairlifts. The AI-extracted requirements and document summaries provide a good understanding of what is expected from bidders. The justification for not dividing the tender into parts is also clearly stated.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and key submission forms. However, not all documents are marked as 'Required', which could lead to confusion about what is strictly mandatory for submission. The 'Tender pass' being described as 'not intended for completion' also adds a layer of potential ambiguity.

Reiluus85/100

The tender process appears fair, with full document access and disclosure of the estimated value. E-submission and e-procurement are standard. The evaluation criterion is primarily cost-based, which is objective, but a slight lack of detail on the 'relative_weighting' for other potential criteria (if any) could be a minor concern. No requirements are tailored to specific companies.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

While e-submission is mandated, the process could be made more practical. The 'Hankepass' being described as 'not intended for completion' and the XML ESPD being machine-readable but not directly usable by AI analysis can create minor hurdles. The 'Tender pass' being an initial confirmation rather than a fillable document requires careful interpretation by bidders.

Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and dates are populated logically. The timeline is consistent, with submission and opening dates aligning appropriately. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions. The contract duration and tender validity periods are clearly specified and do not conflict.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly include provisions for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the value of the tender is moderate, the absence of sustainability considerations is a missed opportunity for a public sector procurement.

Vahvuudet

Clear CPV code and detailed scope of services.
Well-defined submission and opening dates.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement facilitate accessibility.
Objective primary evaluation criterion (cost).

Huolenaiheet

Lack of explicit sustainability requirements (green, social, innovation).
Potential ambiguity regarding the 'Hankepass' document.
Not all documents clearly marked as mandatory.

Suositukset

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria to encourage greener or more socially responsible bids.
2. Clarify the purpose and expected use of the 'Hankepass' document for bidders.
3. Ensure all documents that are strictly required for bid completeness are explicitly marked as such.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin