Tenders

"Waste data benchmarks" - within the framework of the innovation project "Creation of a model for assessing the accuracy of waste data and the impacts and results related to waste collection and management"

Open
Deadline
8 days left
March 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306861
Value
€30,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Expected quality of the research and development service75%
Cost of the research and development service25%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 10, 2026

Tender Opening

March 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€30,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€40,919
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
495 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Through the procurement procedure, it is intended to procure a comprehensive research study on standardized metrics and evaluation criteria that can be used to assess the accuracy of data in the field of waste management of local governments (LG) and the results and impacts of the activities of organized waste collection service providers. “Waste data benchmarks” is part of the Government Office's innovation project “Creation of a model for assessing the accuracy of waste data and the impacts and results related to waste collection and management”, which will create an LG desktop model to support national waste data systems and the daily management and strategic planning of waste management.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Offers will be evaluated based on the expected quality of the research and development service (75% weight) and cost (25% weight).
--The best quality and lowest price will receive maximum points.
--The contract project outlines the terms of service provision and the legal framework for the innovation project.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they have no tax debt.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm their offer complies with all conditions in the tender documents.
--Conditional offers are not allowed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender seeks the development of benchmarks for waste data.
--The project involves creating a model for assessing the accuracy of waste data.
--The project involves creating a model for assessing the impacts and results related to waste collection and management.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The estimated value of the tender is 30,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306861_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.7 KB

The bidder must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set forth in the tender documents, as conditional bids are not permitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306861_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.4 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the expected quality of the research and development service (75% weight) and its cost (25% weight), with the best quality and lowest cost receiving maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306861_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 3.6 KB

Bidders must prove they have no tax arrears to participate in Tartu Rural Municipality Government's waste data innovation project tender.

HindamismetoodikaPDF
Hindamismetoodika.pdf -- 813.6 KB

The assessment methodology outlines how submitted bids will be evaluated to select the best one for implementing the innovation project 'Creation of a model for assessing the veracity of waste data and the impacts and results related to waste collection and management'.

Kutse pakkumuse esitamiseksPDF
Kutse_pakkumuse_esitamiseks.pdf -- 343.0 KB

Tartu Rural Municipality invites bids for an innovation project focused on creating benchmarks for waste data, including a model for assessing the veracity of waste data and the impacts and outcomes of waste collection and management.

Kvalifitseerimise tingimusedPDF
Kvalifitseerimise_tingimused.pdf -- 233.1 KB

This document outlines the qualification conditions required to participate in the tender for Tartu Municipality's innovation project on waste data benchmarks.

LähteülesannePDF
Lähteülesanne.pdf -- 1.4 MB

The contracting authority seeks the development of waste data benchmarks within an innovation project, aiming to create a model for assessing the veracity of waste data and the impacts and outcomes related to waste collection and management.

Teenuslepingu projektPDF
Teenuslepingu_projekt.pdf -- 3.4 MB

The contracting authority provides a draft contract outlining the service provision terms and legal framework for the innovation project.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for waste data benchmarks is well-structured with clear objectives and evaluation criteria, though it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is appropriate for research and development. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The tender is EU funded, suggesting adherence to EU procurement law.

Clarity80/100

The description of the innovation project and its objectives is clear. Requirements for technical capability are well-defined through the project's goals. Evaluation criteria are specified with relative weighting, providing a clear understanding of how bids will be assessed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. Key dates like submission deadline and contract start are specified. However, the full scope of 'all conditions in the tender documents' and the exact nature of 'contract project outlines' could be more detailed.

Fairness85/100

The tender provides full access to documents and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria are objective and weighted. The use of e-submission and e-procurement characteristics promotes fairness. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. The contract start date is provided. However, details regarding financing sources beyond 'EU Funded' and the specific duration of the contract (beyond 'Tender Valid: 2 months') are not explicitly detailed in the provided text.

Financing information beyond 'EU Funded' is not detailed.
Specific contract duration is not explicitly stated beyond tender validity.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Innovation Focus' and 'EU Funded', which can indirectly relate to sustainability goals. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria for green procurement or social aspects, which are common in modern tenders.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social responsibility criteria.

Strengths

Clear project objectives and scope.
Well-defined evaluation criteria with weighting.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
EU funding indicated.

Concerns

Limited explicit sustainability criteria (green/social).
Some practical details like financing sources and exact contract duration could be clearer.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green procurement or social responsibility clauses.
2. Provide more detailed information on financing beyond 'EU Funded' and clarify the exact contract duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline