Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login19 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
12 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must submit a tender by adhering to the contracting authority's conditions, separating confidential business secrets, and completing forms for cost and specialist qualifications.
This form is an application to participate in the tender procedure, confirming the bid's compliance with all terms and requirements.
The bidder must submit Form 3, which includes a detailed price table for various components of owner supervision services and general costs.
The bidder must submit a form detailing the CV and experience of the responsible supervisor specialist to meet the evaluation criteria.
The tender requires the submission of a CV form detailing information for specialists in strong current, fire and alarm signaling, and heating, ventilation, and cooling owner supervision.
The bidder must submit a detailed work organization plan, describing specialist involvement, quality control, archaeological supervision, gas equipment installation oversight, work drawing control, and complex system testing.
This document is a joint bid authorization letter, empowering one bidder to act on behalf of others in the public procurement.
The tender evaluates the bid price (70% weight), the responsible specialist's experience (20% weight), and the work organization plan (10% weight), with the lowest price and best quality receiving the most points.
The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for completion itself.
This technical specification defines owner supervision and heritage protection supervision services for the Väike-Maarja Training Centre infrastructure construction tender.
This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and scope of construction owner supervision services for the Väike-Maarja Learning Centre's infrastructure development.
This document provides instructions for bid submission, including electronic submission, technical specifications, and contract terms, and outlines evaluation criteria.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender is generally well-structured and clearly defined, with a good balance of technical and financial evaluation criteria. However, it could benefit from clearer integration of sustainability aspects.
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure type is clearly indicated. Deadlines seem reasonable given the tender's scope. No obvious disputes or regulatory compliance issues are flagged.
The objective of the tender is clearly stated, and the description of the service required is understandable. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what bidders need to submit. Document titles and summaries offer helpful context.
Most essential information such as estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines are present. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' combined with the disclosed estimated value might be slightly confusing for some bidders, though not a critical omission. The need for bidder-provided documents for evaluation criteria is expected but adds to submission complexity.
The tender promotes fairness through objective evaluation criteria (weighted). The disclosure of the estimated value and the clear indication of electronic submission are positive. The requirement for bidders to comply with confidentiality measures for restricted information is standard and does not appear to unfairly target specific companies.
Electronic submission is mandated, which is practical. However, the 'Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek' document, which contains important instructions for bid submission, is marked as 'Required: No', which could lead to confusion or oversights by bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, deadlines, and value are consistently populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the estimated value is moderate, there's a missed opportunity to incorporate sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required