Tenders

Maintenance service for Pargi and Reisi parking lots 2026-2029

Open
Deadline
15 days left
March 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306729
Value
€178,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of parking and travel parking lot maintenance service100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 18, 2026

Tender Opening

March 18, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€178,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Maintenance service for Tallinn's Pargi and Reisi parking lots.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The deadline for submission is 2026-03-18 10:00:00.
--The tender is not divided into lots to ensure unified and comprehensive service management.
--The estimated value of the tender is 178,000.0 EUR.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must confirm that they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
--The bidder must provide information regarding business secrets.
--The bidder must electronically confirm their compliance with tender conditions via the Hankepass.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306729_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved and provide information regarding trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306729_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306729_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.2 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration of the company's compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for parking maintenance services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific details on technical and financial capabilities and has limited sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. The exclusion of Russian-affiliated entities is a specific geopolitical requirement, not necessarily a legal compliance issue in itself, but it is a notable characteristic. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise. Requirements regarding exclusion grounds and the Hankepass are clearly stated. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly defined. However, technical and financial capability requirements are not detailed, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Technical capability requirements not specified.
Financial requirements not specified.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are specified. However, the absence of detailed technical and financial requirements means crucial information for bidders is missing.

Technical capability requirements not specified.
Financial requirements not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The requirement to exclude entities associated with the Russian Federation, while potentially driven by external policy, is applied universally to all potential bidders and does not appear to unfairly target specific companies. The lack of detailed technical/financial requirements could be seen as a minor fairness concern as it might favor bidders with less robust internal processes.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and the opening place is provided. The contract start date is clear. However, information regarding financing sources is not provided, and the duration, while specified, could benefit from more context on how it aligns with the service needs.

Financing information not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline is logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria.
No social aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear e-procurement process
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Well-defined timeline and basic tender information
Exclusionary criteria clearly stated

Concerns

Missing technical and financial capability requirements
Lack of sustainability considerations
No information on financing sources

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed technical and financial capability requirements to ensure a more robust selection of bidders.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
3. Provide information on the financing of the contract.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline