Tenders

Nitrogen compounds national reference laboratory service

Open
Deadline
27 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306624
Value
€320,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost50%
Time for responding to technical questions25%
System availability25%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€320,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to find a service provider who will provide the national reference laboratory service for nitrogen compounds in Estonia in accordance with Article 100 (1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council (on official controls and other official activities carried out to ensure the application of food and feed legislation, animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm they meet all conditions set out in the tender documents, including submitting the bid according to the structure and proving compliance with legal requirements.
--The tender is for the service of the state reference laboratory for nitrogen compounds.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-03-30 11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm they meet all conditions set out in the tender documents, including submitting the bid according to the structure and proving compliance with legal requirements.
--The contracting authority requires conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract execution phase, including questions related to criminal convictions and corruption.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The service provider must be able to provide the state reference laboratory service for nitrogen compounds in accordance with EU Regulation 2017/625.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is not divided into lots because the subject of the procurement contract is functionally interdependent services.
--Bidders must provide their total cost calculation according to the services and units provided, with the annual service cost pre-defined and hourly rate calculated if necessary.
--The best bids will receive the highest score based on the evaluation criteria.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is a significant evaluation criterion (50%).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306624_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 18.8 KB

The contracting authority requires conditions for checking subcontractors during contract execution, including questions about criminal convictions and corruption.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306624_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.8 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with all tender document conditions, including submitting the bid according to the structure and proving fulfillment of legal requirements.

Pakkumuse vormikohane kogumaksumus (lisa 4)/ The total value of the tender in ca...DOC
Lisa_4_Annex_4_Kogumaksumuse_arvutamine.docx -- 21.0 KB

Bidders must submit their total tender cost calculation based on the provided services and units, with annual service costs given and hourly rates to be calculated as needed.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306624_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.3 KB

Tender evaluation criteria include total cost (50%), response time to technical questions (25%), and system availability (25%), with the best offers receiving the highest scores.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306624_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 77.4 KB

The Procurement Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Riigihanke alusdokumendid_public procurement documentsPDF
Riigihanke_alusdokumendid.pdf -- 1.8 MB

The Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture is seeking a service provider for the National Reference Laboratory for nitrogenous compounds according to EU Regulation 2017/625, with the contract awarded to the most economically advantageous tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a national reference laboratory service for nitrogen compounds is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed location information.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement, including a clear procedure and a relevant CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The reference to EU Regulation 2017/625 ensures alignment with EU legal frameworks.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required is clear, referencing specific EU regulations. Requirements for bidders, including exclusion grounds and eligibility, are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the detailed breakdown of 'response time to technical questions' and 'system availability' could be more granular.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like 'Vastavustingimused' (Compliance Conditions) and 'Pakkumuse vormikohane kogumaksumus' (Tender Cost Calculation Form) are marked as required. However, the 'Location Info' is vague ('Täpne piirkond määramata' - Exact region not specified), which could impact completeness for some bidders.

Vague location information
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The evaluation criteria are objective, with a significant weighting for cost. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are standard. The contract start date is specified. However, the lack of specific location details might pose practical challenges for some service providers in assessing their operational feasibility. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value.

Lack of specific location details impacting practical assessment
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and do not indicate any inconsistencies. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded (implied by the regulation reference), specific sustainability goals are not highlighted in the provided information.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation

Strengths

Clear reference to EU regulation
E-procurement and e-submission
Objective evaluation criteria with cost weighting
Reasonable deadlines and logical timeline

Concerns

Vague location information
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Limited detail on technical evaluation criteria beyond cost

Recommendations

1. Provide more specific location details for the service.
2. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
3. Further detail the sub-criteria for 'response time to technical questions' and 'system availability'.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline