Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login21 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
8 documents available with AI summaries
The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with conditions, including confirmations on joint bids, sanctions compliance, and equivalency, as well as marking business secrets.
Bidders must submit Form RD Annex 2, detailing the lecturer's qualifications and consent to conduct A1 Estonian language training.
Bidders must demonstrate experience in teaching Estonian, either through formal education or group training, by providing relevant data and curriculum details.
Bidders must submit an A1 level Estonian language curriculum form, detailing learning outcomes, content, learning environment, materials, methodology, and assessment criteria.
Bidders must confirm they have no grounds for exclusion from the public procurement, providing information about their representatives if necessary.
The tender evaluates bids based on the hourly price for A1 Estonian language training in Jõhvi and Rakvere, where the lowest price is the best.
Bidders must demonstrate that they do not fall under exclusion grounds and meet qualification conditions, covering criminal records, tax arrears, and other professional conduct.
Tender documents contain general information, submission requirements, and necessary documents for offering Estonian language A1 level training in Jõhvi and Rakvere.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for Estonian language A1 training is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria beyond price and details on contract duration.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including clear exclusion grounds and qualification requirements. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are reasonable, and the process appears compliant with general regulations. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond price is a minor concern for legal compliance regarding transparency.
The description of the training objectives and requirements for the curriculum and lecturer qualifications is clear. The use of specific forms (RD Annex 2 and 3) enhances clarity. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price could lead to ambiguity in how bids are assessed.
Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. The description is adequate. However, crucial details such as contract duration and specific locations within Jõhvi and Rakvere are missing, impacting overall completeness.
The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission and e-procurement. Requirements are objective and focus on qualifications and experience. The reliance on price as the primary evaluation criterion is standard. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which are practical. However, the absence of a specified contract start date and financing information reduces practicality for potential bidders needing to plan resources.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated correctly. The dates are logical. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions. The estimated value is clearly stated.
The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific social criteria or innovation focus detailed within the tender documents, limiting its sustainability impact.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required