Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login26 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
14 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses like fraud and money laundering, and requires the company to provide answers regarding compliance with these conditions.
This document outlines mandatory tender submission conditions, including accepting all procurement terms, providing subcontractor details, handling business secrets, submitting bid prices via Forms 2 and 3, and specifying qualification requirements for the construction project manager.
This form serves as the bidder's declaration confirming their bid's compliance with tender documents, acceptance of terms, declaration of subcontractors, and identification of business secrets.
This document is an offer cost table where the bidder must submit prices for various works in the second stage of the procurement for the Museum of Victims of Communism.
This form requires curriculum vitae details for the project manager and object manager assigned to fulfill the contract, along with a confirmation of these specialists' availability.
This form is a power of attorney for joint bids, authorizing one bidder to act on behalf of other joint bidders in the procurement procedure.
This document outlines that bids will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of works (100% weighting), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format, intended for familiarization with the requirements rather than direct completion.
Tender document 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' in .DOCX format (197,851 bytes).
This document is a draft construction contract, outlining general and special conditions, contact details for the client and contractor, and project and construction site specifics.
This document outlines the tender submission procedure, required formats, cost allocation, use of the eRHR system, and special conditions such as clarification for abnormally low prices and site visit dates.
This document is an annex to the technical description, providing construction site data such as elevations, materials, and specific location points at Kalaranna tn 30.
This document is an appendix to the technical description, listing indicative installation volumes for indoor lights and tracks in various rooms, emphasizing the bidder's responsibility to verify quantities and noting that lights in red-highlighted rooms are excluded from the tender scope.
This document outlines the scope of construction works for phases I, II, and III of the Patarei Sea Fortress Museum, covering preparation, demolition, external structures, and network tasks.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and comprehensive documentation, but it suffers from significant inconsistencies and a critical CPV misclassification that could limit competition. While promoting green procurement, it lacks explicit social or innovation aspects.
The tender generally adheres to standard procurement practices, utilizing ESPD and eRHR. Mandatory exclusion grounds are specified. However, the assigned CPV code 'Uste paigaldamine (9298)' (Installation of doors) is significantly too narrow for the broad scope of construction works described, which includes flooring, lighting, automation, and more. This misclassification could hinder competition.
The tender provides a clear and detailed description of the required construction works. Requirements are well-documented, understandable, and supported by various forms and appendices. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as 100% lowest price, ensuring transparency.
All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is present. A comprehensive set of 15 documents, including technical specifications, draft contract, and submission forms, supports the tender. Requirements and evaluation criteria are fully defined.
The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission, objective lowest-price evaluation criteria, and generally generic requirements. The justification for not dividing the tender into lots is reasonable for a complex construction project. The estimated value is disclosed, although the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag creates a minor inconsistency.
Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing accessibility. However, the stated contract start date is explicitly 'presumptive and has no legal meaning,' introducing uncertainty for planning. The actual contract duration is not clearly specified in the basic information, and only a system URL is provided instead of direct document links.
Several significant inconsistencies are present. The CPV code does not align with the detailed work description. The 'Estimated Value' contradicts the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag. Furthermore, the 'Contract Start' date is provided but then declared to have no legal meaning, creating confusion.
The tender explicitly identifies 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step. However, it does not appear to incorporate specific social aspects or an innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required