Tenders

Reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and construction of an outdoor toilet

Open
Deadline
23 days left
March 25, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306566
Value
€161,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 18, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 25, 2026

Tender Opening

March 25, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€161,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and construction of an outdoor toilet
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (6)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet in an open tender procedure.
--The bid form must be used for submitting the price offer.
--The tender deadline is 2026-03-25 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS6
--Bidders must confirm familiarization with the site.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must agree to the terms and conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is an open procedure.
--The contracting authority is Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus.
--The tender is for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The technical description specifies requirements for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet, including the qualification of the responsible construction manager and environmental requirements.
--The tender is based on the work project and technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The bid form requires filling in prices for construction works and materials.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306566_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306566_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, submit a power of attorney for joint bids, agree to terms, define trade secrets, and confirm non-inclusion of subcontractors subject to replacement.

Lisa 6 Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 6 Hinnapakkumus Ninaotsa vaatetorn.xlsx -- 22.1 KB

This document is a form for submitting a price offer for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet tender, requiring the completion of prices for construction works and materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306566_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus will evaluate bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet primarily based on the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306566_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument Ninaotsa.docx -- 23.0 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet in an open procurement procedure, based on the work project and technical description.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
LISA 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_Ninaotsa.docx -- 37.3 KB

This technical specification details the requirements for the reconstruction of the Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet, including the qualifications of the responsible construction manager and environmental considerations.

Lisa 4 Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 38.5 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, defining the contract terms and integral parts for the public procurement 'Reconstruction of Ninaotsa Watchtower and Construction of an Outdoor Toilet'.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and construction of an outdoor toilet is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and some document formats are not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The duration of tender validity (3 months) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with the total bid cost being the primary factor. Conditions for contract modification are also clearly outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and duration. However, several key documents (e.g., technical specifications, project files, drawings) are in formats not directly accessible for AI analysis, potentially hindering a full understanding of all requirements without manual review.

Some essential technical documents are in non-AI-analyzable formats (.asice, .zip).
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized, promoting accessibility. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined as 'PERIOD' without a specific end date, relying on the tender valid period.

Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Contract duration is not precisely defined beyond the tender validity period.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined legal and procedural aspects.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations.
Inaccessibility of some technical documents for automated analysis.
Vague contract duration.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, material sourcing).
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in machine-readable formats.
3. Clarify the expected contract duration or end date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline