Tenders

Porijõe pedestrian bridge preliminary design

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306478
Value
€10,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€10,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
84
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The objective of the procurement is to order the preliminary design of the Porijõe bridge in the first phase, without conducting physical construction surveys.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

25 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (8)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-03 09:00:00.
--Submit an electronically filled European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in the expected format.
--Submit the "Application for participation in the procurement procedure" form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Confirm compliance with qualification requirements.
--Confirm agreement with the tender conditions.
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The project involves the preliminary design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge.
--The preliminary design must specify the bridge type.
--The preliminary design must specify the bridge dimensions (gabariidid).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a financial offer for the preliminary design project.
--The preliminary design must include cost estimates (as part of the deliverable).
--Bids will be evaluated solely on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306478_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines the compliance conditions for submitting a tender, covering power of attorney for joint bids, declaration of business secrets, subcontractor involvement, and confirmation of bid adherence to terms.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306478_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation criteria for the Porijõe light traffic bridge preliminary design tender, where bids will be assessed solely based on cost, with the lowest bid receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306478_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 40.7 KB

This ESPD is an informational document for the Porijõe pedestrian bridge preliminary design tender, outlining the conditions and expected response format for the electronically submitted ESPD, rather than being a form for direct completion.

HankedokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 27.1 KB

This document is the basic public procurement document from Kambja Rural Municipality Government for the Porijõe light traffic bridge sketch project, outlining the procurement procedure type, deadlines, and contact information.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 32.4 KB

This document is a draft service contract between Kambja Rural Municipality Government and a contractor, outlining the terms and scope for the preliminary design of the Porijõe light traffic bridge.

Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 537.9 KB

This document outlines the terms of reference for the Porijõgi pedestrian bridge preliminary design, specifying requirements for bridge type, dimensions, load capacity, cost, and location.

Lisa 1 Jõeveere DP põhijoonisPDF
Lisa 1 Jõeveere DP põhijoonis.pdf -- 2.0 MB

This document is the main drawing of the Jõeveere detailed plan, providing background information and context for the design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge.

Taotlus hankemenetluses osalemiseksDOC
Taotlus hankemenetluses osalemiseks.docx -- 23.4 KB

This document is an application for participation in the procurement procedure, where the tenderer confirms their agreement with the tender conditions and compliance with the qualification requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

84
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the preliminary design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge is well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its clear requirements and objective evaluation criteria. While generally compliant and complete, minor inconsistencies in metadata and a lack of explicit sustainability focus are noted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender adheres to national regulations for simplified procedures, with reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. A minor inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description is present but clarified by the detailed documents.

Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. price-only) in high-level metadata.
Clarity90/100

The project description, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly defined and easily understandable, supported by comprehensive documentation.

Completeness95/100

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, and a full set of relevant documents, is provided. The XML document not being AI-analyzed is not a critical human-readable information gap.

Fairness95/100

The procurement ensures fairness through transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements are generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date and specific financing details are not explicitly provided.

Contract start date not explicitly provided.
Specific financing details (beyond estimated value) are not available.
Data Consistency80/100

Most data fields are consistent. A minor discrepancy exists between the high-level evaluation criteria description (relative_weighting) and the detailed document, which specifies price-only evaluation.

Inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in basic info and 'Bids will be evaluated solely on price' in AI-extracted requirements/documents.
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly include green, social, or innovation-related sustainability criteria. This is common for small, technical service procurements but results in a low score for this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and specific technical requirements for the preliminary design.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Comprehensive documentation provided, including draft contract and technical specifications.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility.
Reasonable submission deadline for the scope and value of the project.

Concerns

Minor inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. price-only) in the metadata, though clarified in documents.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Absence of a specified contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Ensure consistency in all tender metadata, particularly regarding evaluation criteria, to avoid potential confusion.
2. Consider incorporating basic sustainability or social responsibility clauses, even for small procurements, where applicable.
3. Provide an estimated contract start date for better planning by potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline