Aseptic Unit Re-Development at Arrowe Park Hospital

This tender provides a clear project description but suffers from critical omissions in documentation and evaluation criteria, alongside highly restrictive technical requirements that severely limit competition.

Significant gaps exist due to the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for a legally sound procurement process.

The project description and technical requirements for case studies are clear. However, the overall clarity of the procurement process is severely hampered by the lack of tender documents and evaluation criteria.

The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any tender documents, explicit financial requirements, and detailed evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

The fairness of this tender is highly questionable. The technical capability requirements, specifically the mandate for all four case studies to be UK-based and at least one with MHRA MS Licence experience, are unduly restrictive and strongly suggest tailoring to a very limited pool of suppliers, potentially hindering open competition.

The practicality for bidders is extremely low. Without any tender documents, evaluation criteria, or detailed financial requirements, bidders cannot practically understand the full scope, terms, or assessment methodology, making a meaningful bid submission impossible.

No inconsistencies were detected within the provided tender information.

No sustainability (green or social) criteria are mentioned, indicating a missed opportunity to incorporate broader public value considerations into the procurement.