Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login1 requirements across 1 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
12 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses like fraud and money laundering, and requires the bidder to provide answers regarding compliance with these conditions.
This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including the adoption of contracting authority's terms, handling of business secrets, submission of Forms 2 and 3 for participation and pricing, and qualification requirements for the construction project manager.
This form serves as a bidder's declaration confirming understanding and acceptance of tender conditions, commitment to the bid's cost and validity, and declaration of subcontractors and trade secrets.
This document is a tender cost table where the bidder must fill in the prices for various design and construction works and related services in euros, excluding VAT.
This form is for submitting the CVs of key specialists (project manager, site manager) required for the contract, including their name, date of birth, professional certificate number, and a confirmation of their availability.
This form is a power of attorney used for joint bids, authorizing one partner to act on behalf of others in the procurement procedure.
Bidders must complete this form to provide the furniture specifications for the Tõnismäe State Gymnasium project, filling in all white or red marked cells.
This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that offers will be assessed solely on price, with the lowest bid receiving the maximum points.
This explanatory ESPD document outlines the qualification conditions and exclusion grounds for the Tõnismäe State Gymnasium changing and washing rooms construction tender, which bidders must complete electronically.
This document provides instructions for submitting a tender, outlines general procurement conditions, refers to the technical description and draft contract, and includes contact details and site visit times.
This document is the technical description for the public procurement of the construction of changing rooms and washrooms for Tõnismäe State Gymnasium, defining the scope of work, basic documents, object data, and the main contractor's obligations in preparing the work project and arranging expertise.
This document is a draft construction contract for the development of changing and washing rooms at Tõnismäe State Gymnasium, outlining general and special conditions, deadlines, and penalties.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender is comprehensive in its documentation and supports electronic submission, but is significantly hampered by critical inconsistencies in evaluation criteria and ambiguities regarding financial classification and contract start dates.
The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, providing reasonable deadlines and standard clauses like 'or equivalent'. However, the CPV code '5868' is not a standard 8-digit code, and the statement 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value, creating minor compliance ambiguities.
While the project description and requirements are generally clear, a critical contradiction exists between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit statement that evaluation is 'solely on price'. The indicative nature of the contract start date also reduces clarity for bidders.
The tender is largely complete, providing all essential basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and a comprehensive set of 13 documents including technical specifications and a draft contract. Minor details like explicit contract duration in the basic info are not present but likely covered in documents.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, e-procurement, and the 'or equivalent' clause. However, the fundamental contradiction in evaluation criteria (price vs. relative weighting) severely undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot be certain how their proposals will truly be assessed.
Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the contract start date being 'indicative and has no legal meaning' reduces the practicality for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation. The lack of explicit contract duration in the basic information also slightly impacts planning.
This category presents the most significant issues. There is a direct and critical contradiction between the stated evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting') and the detailed explanation ('solely on price'). The CPV code is non-standard, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' statement conflicts with the disclosed estimated value.
The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, it lacks specific social criteria and innovation focus, and is not identified as EU-funded, which often brings higher sustainability requirements.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required