Provision of burial and cremation services for unbefriended persons for the needs of Limbaži Municipality Social Service

This tender for funeral and cremation services exhibits significant transparency and accessibility issues due to restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, despite clear basic information and reasonable submission timelines.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the 'Restricted document access' are significant transparency issues that may violate national or EU procurement principles regarding equal treatment and public access to tender documentation.

The tender description and AI-extracted requirements provide a clear overview of the subject and evaluation criteria (lowest price). However, the 'Restricted document access' fundamentally undermines the practical clarity for potential bidders, as detailed specifications and conditions are inaccessible.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. While requirements and criteria are summarized, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and the critical issue of 'Restricted document access,' which prevents bidders from obtaining the full tender package.

The tender suffers from severe fairness issues due to 'Restricted document access,' which prevents all potential bidders from having equal access to essential information. The undisclosed estimated value also hinders fair competition. The contradiction regarding e-submission further raises concerns about equal access to the submission process.

The practicality is significantly hampered by 'Restricted document access,' making it difficult for bidders to prepare and submit a compliant offer. The 'No e-submission' flag (if accurate) also presents a practical barrier, and the contract start date and financing details are not provided.

The tender exhibits significant data consistency issues, with direct contradictions between different sections. Notably, there are conflicts regarding 'E-Procurement' vs. 'No e-submission,' 'Documents available' vs. 'Restricted document access,' and 'Evaluation criteria specified' vs. 'No evaluation criteria specified.' This indicates poor data management.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.