Tenders

Oral anti-infective drugs and immunoglobulins

Open
Deadline
7 days left
March 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306353
Value
€167,205
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 10, 2026

Tender Opening

March 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€167,205
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
78
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Sale of goods on demand and transport of goods to Viljandi Hospital
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirm compliance with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306353_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 141.7 KB

Tenderers must confirm compliance with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, provide a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid, and declare any business secrets according to legal requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306353_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 24.4 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria and methodology, with cost being the primary evaluation criterion, accounting for 100% of the weight for each part of the procurement.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306353_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.8 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and the qualification requirements expected from the undertaking.

Lepingu lisa 1. Tarne logistilised tingimusedDOC
Lepingu lisa 1 Tarne logistilised tingimused.... -- 615.6 KB

This contract annex describes the logistical delivery conditions for goods to Viljandi Hospital's Tervikum building logistics terminal, including vehicle dimension restrictions, unloading procedures, and reception times.

Lisa 2. Raamlepingu kavandDOC
Lisa 2 Raamlepingu kavand.doc -- 65.5 KB

This document is the draft framework agreement for Viljandi Hospital's procurement of oral anti-infective drugs and immunoglobulins, outlining the terms and legal framework of the future contract.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.doc -- 60.0 KB

This document outlines the tender conditions, submission requirements, and the general framework for preparing and submitting a bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for oral anti-infective drugs and immunoglobulins demonstrates good clarity and fairness, particularly with its 100% cost-based evaluation and electronic submission. However, it could improve by explicitly stating the contract duration and including sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears legally compliant, with reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no disputes. The use of ESPD and explicit mention of EU sanctions compliance indicates adherence to regulatory frameworks. The procedure type 'A' is generic but likely standard within the local system.

Clarity90/100

The tender description is clear, and evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% cost-based, which is highly transparent. A comprehensive set of documents (qualification, compliance, contract draft, logistics) suggests detailed and understandable requirements, despite the brevity of AI-extracted requirements.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information, deadlines, and estimated value are provided. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main summary, which is a notable omission. The NUTS code is missing, and three documents (XLS/XML) were not summarized by AI, potentially obscuring some details.

Missing explicit contract duration in the main summary.
Missing NUTS code.
Fairness95/100

This tender scores highly on fairness due to its fully disclosed estimated value, reasonable submission deadline, and the highly objective and transparent 100% cost-based evaluation criteria. Electronic submission further ensures equal access for bidders, and there is no indication of requirements being tailored.

Practicality70/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, and the portal URL is provided. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration in the main summary could require bidders to delve deeper into the documents, impacting immediate practicality.

Contract start date and duration are not explicitly stated in the main summary.
Data Consistency85/100

Dates are logical and there are no disputes. However, the field 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the actual disclosure of the estimated value, and the NUTS code is missing, indicating minor inconsistencies in data population.

Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed estimated value.
Missing NUTS code.
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which typically correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No explicit sustainability criteria.
No social responsibility aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% cost-based).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline (19 days).
Comprehensive set of supporting documents (ESPD, draft contract, logistics).
No disputes or suspensions.

Concerns

Contract duration not explicitly stated in the main summary.
Missing NUTS code for geographical classification.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Contradiction in 'Value Classified' field vs. disclosed value.
Three documents (XLS/XML) were not summarized by AI, potentially hiding key details.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly state the contract duration in the main tender summary for improved clarity for bidders.
2. Include relevant NUTS codes for precise geographical classification.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or social responsibility criteria where applicable, even for pharmaceutical procurements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline