The Approach Car Park Rayleigh Resurfacing

This tender provides a clear project description but suffers from significant gaps in critical information, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, which impacts fairness and overall quality.

The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV codes. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a fundamental legal requirement. The absence of detailed eligibility requirements is also a concern.

The project description and technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly impacts the clarity for potential bidders. Financial and eligibility requirements are also not clearly detailed.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are well-provided. However, the tender lacks comprehensive details regarding eligibility, financial requirements, and crucially, the evaluation criteria, which are essential for a complete tender package.

The estimated value is disclosed, and technical requirements appear generic. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis for award decisions. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises concerns.

The contract start date and duration are clear. While electronic submission is stated as a requirement, this is contradicted by automated checks, creating uncertainty. The lack of a direct document URL is a practical hurdle for bidders. Financing information is minimal.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a direct contradiction between the stated requirement for electronic submission and the automated check indicating no e-submission. The missing 'Liable Person' is a minor inconsistency.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is common for smaller works but results in a low score for this category. It is also not EU funded.