Tenders

Purchase of infusion therapy supplies

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306316
Value
€118,500
Location
Estonia
Published
February 13, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€118,500
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
79
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of infusion therapy supplies. The procurement is divided into 7 lots. The contracting authority will evaluate each lot separately.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tenderer must define information considered as business secrets in the offer.
--The offer price must be submitted using Appendix 3 Price Form, including unit prices and total sums for each part of the tender.
--The tenderer must confirm the compliance of the offered products with detailed technical requirements using Appendix 1 Technical Description.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must meet the mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The offer must comply with all conditions set forth in the procurement documents.
--The tenderer must accept the terms and conditions of the draft contract (Appendix 2).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The offered infusion therapy supplies must comply with the Medical Device Regulation (MDR).
--The offered infusion therapy supplies must have a CE-marking.
--The offered products must comply with the detailed requirements specified in Appendix 1 Technical Description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The offer price must be presented according to the structure described in the procurement documents.
--The sole evaluation criterion for the offer is the lowest total cost (100% weight).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306316_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 30.7 KB

This document sets out the conditions for submitting a tender, including rules for defining business secrets, requirements for compliance with tender documents and medical device regulations (MDR, CE marking), and the structure for presenting the tender price.

Kas pakkuja on täitnud ja esitanud (soovitava Osa suhtes) Lisa 1 Tehnilise kirje...DOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (täitmiseks) 13022... -- 23.7 KB

This document is a technical description for infusion therapy accessories, requiring bidders to confirm the compliance of their offered products with detailed requirements and to submit the manufacturer's technical documentation.

Kas ettevõtja on täitnud ja esitanud (vastava Osa suhtes) Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksu...DOC
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm (täitmiseks) ... -- 16.1 KB

This tender price form (Annex 3) requires bidders to submit unit prices and total sums for infusion therapy supplies for each tender part.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306316_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 9.8 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and methodology, where the total cost is the primary evaluation criterion, accounting for 100% of the weighting.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306316_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 68.5 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining tender conditions and the format for submitting bidder information, but it is not to be filled out or submitted directly, serving only for familiarization with the terms.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu eelnõuDOC
Lisa 2 Hankeleping 130226.docx -- 22.6 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the purchase of infusion therapy supplies, outlining the terms and obligations of the parties.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

79
Good

Tender Quality Score

Overall, this tender is well-structured and transparent with clear evaluation criteria, but it has notable gaps regarding contract duration and sustainability aspects. Its strong emphasis on fairness and electronic processes is commendable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, adhering to standard procedures, reasonable deadlines, and proper CPV classification. Mandatory disclosure requirements are met, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'Type A' and 'Procedure A' codes are somewhat vague but likely correspond to national legal frameworks.

Clarity90/100

The tender is highly clear. The description of the procurement, the division into parts, and the evaluation criteria (lowest total cost, 100% weight) are explicitly stated. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-defined, making it easy for bidders to understand expectations. The automated check's flag for 'no evaluation criteria specified' is incorrect, as they are clearly defined.

Completeness70/100

While basic information, deadlines, and value are provided, there is a significant omission regarding the contract duration, which is crucial for bidder planning. The NUTS code for geographical location is also missing, which is a minor gap.

Missing contract duration
Missing NUTS code
Fairness95/100

This tender scores very high on fairness. It offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, provides reasonable deadlines, and uses objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest total cost). The enablement of e-procurement and the division into 7 parts further enhance competition and accessibility for various bidders, including SMEs. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

Practicality70/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which is highly practical. However, the absence of a clear contract duration poses a practical challenge for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation. The document URL for the opening place is provided.

Missing clear contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is a minor inconsistency given the value is explicitly disclosed, likely a system artifact. The tender itself is consistent regarding evaluation criteria, despite the automated check's incorrect flag.

Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. There is no indication of EU funding, which often brings higher sustainability standards. This reflects a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects included

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest total cost).
Tender divided into 7 parts, promoting competition and SME participation.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Comprehensive technical and submission requirements.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Concerns

Missing explicit contract duration.
Missing NUTS code for geographical location.
Lack of sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is confusing given the value is disclosed.

Recommendations

1. Clearly state the contract duration to allow bidders to plan effectively.
2. Include NUTS codes for better geographical identification.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria where applicable for future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline