Tenders

Provision of catering services to Tallinn Rõõmupesa Kindergarten

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Research
Reference
306299
Value
€250,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost per meal day for one child in garden group (3 - 7 years old)60%
Cost per meal day for one child in nursery group (1.5 - 3 years old)40%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€250,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Research
83
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€2,220,428
Avg. Bids
3.2
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
67%
182 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Food will be prepared in the kindergarten premises throughout the contract period (except for periods of group closure), on all working days. Submission of an offer is conditional upon familiarization with the place of contract performance.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Electronically complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit anti-corruption affirmations.
--Submit a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Meet the exclusion criteria described in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit anti-corruption affirmations.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet the qualification criteria described in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit a power of attorney for joint bidders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are explicitly mentioned.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are explicitly mentioned.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306299_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.0 KB

This document outlines the conditions for tender submission and compliance, including anti-corruption confirmations, power of attorney requirements for joint bidders, tender cost structure, definition of business secrets, and the submission of a price list for additional services.

Lisa 3_Lisateenuste hinnakiriDOC
Lisa 3_Lisateenuste hinnakiri.docx -- 16.8 KB

This document is a price list for additional services, where the tenderer must provide unit prices for various supplementary services related to kindergarten events, which must not be included in the daily food cost.

Lisa 4_Personali lõunasöögi hinnapakkumusDOC
Lisa 4_Personali lõunasöögi hinnapakkumus.doc... -- 15.5 KB

This document is a form for submitting a price offer for staff lunches, including cost, order submission instructions, and payment options.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306299_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document details the evaluation criteria for the catering service tender for Tallinna Rõõmupesa Lasteaed, where 40% of the score is based on the food day cost for the nursery group and 60% for the garden group, with the lowest price being preferred.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306299_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 37.4 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria that bidders must complete electronically.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

83
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for catering services demonstrates good clarity and fairness, with a strong emphasis on electronic processes and green procurement. Minor ambiguities regarding value classification and unanalyzed documents slightly impact completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears largely compliant with procurement regulations, utilizing the ESPD and clearly defining the procedure type and CPV codes. No disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating a smooth process.

Clarity90/100

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined with clear weightings, contributing to high clarity.

Completeness80/100

All essential information, including title, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. While documents are listed, the AI's inability to analyze XML and ASICE formats means their content cannot be fully verified, slightly impacting completeness.

Some tender documents (XML, ASICE) could not be analyzed by AI, potentially obscuring details.
Fairness90/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, objective lowest-price evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored, and the site visit is a reasonable prerequisite for catering services.

Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are clear. The absence of an explicit document URL in the provided data and limited detailed financing information slightly reduces the practicality score.

Explicit document URL not provided in the input data.
Detailed financing information beyond estimated value is not available.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. The minor inconsistency of 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value does not significantly detract from overall data consistency.

Minor inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' is stated, yet an estimated value is provided.
Sustainability60/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of specific social or innovation criteria limits its overall sustainability scope.

No explicit social criteria mentioned.
No explicit innovation focus mentioned.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price with specific weightings).
Explicitly includes Green Procurement characteristics.
Comprehensive use of ESPD for qualification and exclusion.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled.
Detailed timeline and contract duration provided.

Concerns

Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being public.
Lack of specific social or innovation criteria in the tender.
Some tender documents (XML, ASICE) were not analyzable, potentially hiding important details.
No specific technical or financial capability requirements beyond ESPD are explicitly mentioned.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status if the estimated value is already publicly disclosed.
2. Consider integrating specific social and innovation criteria to enhance the tender's sustainability profile.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in easily analyzable formats or include comprehensive summaries.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline