Tenders

Repair of Vanasadam cruise quay no. 24 and 25 and corrosion protection works of piles

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306235
Value
€580,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer cost (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€580,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
74
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the repair of Vanasadam cruise quays no. 24 and 25 and the corrosion protection works of the piles. The technical specification is provided in Annex 1 of the Public Procurement Documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bid must be submitted by 2026-03-09 12:00:00.
--Prior registration is required via the procurement register's information exchange page to visit the site.
--Bidder must confirm compliance with bid submission conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Grounds for exclusion of bidders according to RHS § 95.
--Grounds for exclusion of subcontractors (e.g., corruption, acts of terrorism) and the bidder must confirm subcontractors' compliance with these conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidder must confirm compliance with international sanctions.
--Bidder must confirm compliance with environmental conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Provide proof of proper execution of at least one port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bid cost must be submitted excluding VAT.
--Bidder must confirm compliance with cost submission conditions.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306235_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 39.2 KB

This document specifies the exclusion grounds for subcontractors, such as convictions for corruption or terrorist acts, and requires the tenderer to confirm their subcontractors' compliance with these conditions.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306235_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.8 KB

This document outlines the compliance requirements for tender submission, cost, international sanctions, and environmental conditions, which the bidder must confirm when submitting their tender.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 306235... -- 46.1 KB

Download failed - no summary available

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306235_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that bids will be evaluated solely based on the offer price (excluding VAT), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306235_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.4 KB

This document specifies the grounds for exclusion of tenderers according to RHS § 95 and technical qualification requirements, including the need to provide proof of at least one successfully completed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimusele tuginemi...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.2 KB

Download failed - no summary available

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 306235.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney template for joint bidders, allowing one partner to authorize another to submit the tender on their behalf.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) viitenr 306235.pdf -- 295.7 KB

Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

74
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for quay repair and corrosion protection is generally well-structured with clear requirements and evaluation criteria, but its overall quality is significantly hampered by the inaccessibility of several critical tender documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates good adherence to national procurement law, with clearly defined exclusion grounds and procedure type, and an appropriate CPV code. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarity90/100

The tender description is clear, requirements are well-articulated, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive.

Completeness60/100

While basic information is present, the inability to access or process critical documents such as the Technical Specification, Draft Contract, and Cost Tables significantly reduces the completeness score, leaving key details unknown.

Critical tender documents (Technical Specification, Draft Contract, Cost Tables) are inaccessible or unprocessed, leaving key details unknown.
Fairness70/100

The lack of access to essential tender documents compromises full transparency and equal access to information for all potential bidders. The technical capability requirement appears reasonable and not overly tailored.

Inaccessibility of critical tender documents hinders full transparency and equal access to information.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is a positive. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and the inaccessibility of detailed financing conditions (due to unprocessed documents) are practical drawbacks.

No explicit contract start date provided.
Detailed financing conditions are not accessible due to unprocessed documents.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are mostly populated, dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. A minor inconsistency exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value.

Minor inconsistency with 'Value Classified: Yes' despite an estimated value being disclosed.
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly includes green procurement characteristics and environmental conditions. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, and is not EU funded.

No explicit social criteria included.
No innovation focus identified.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Electronic submission enabled
Explicit green procurement focus
Adherence to national legal framework

Concerns

Inaccessibility of critical tender documents (Technical Specification, Draft Contract, Cost Tables)
Lack of explicit social criteria
No innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and processable for bidders.
2. Provide a clear contract start date.
3. Consider incorporating social aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline