Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login16 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
The contracting authority verifies subcontractors' background regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.
Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions, complete the cost breakdown in Excel, and identify/justify trade secrets, submitting joint bid details if applicable.
This tender document contains a cost breakdown for the Tõdva bridge construction, required for detailed submission of the bid's cost.
The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the construction cost of the Tõdva bridge, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The tender pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.
The tender's foundational document contains general information, procurement procedure rules, and bidder qualification conditions necessary for submitting a bid.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for bridge construction is generally well-structured with clear evaluation criteria and good data consistency. However, it lacks explicit technical capability requirements and has limited sustainability considerations.
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear CPV code, a defined procedure, and a reasonable timeline. No major legal issues were flagged.
The description of the work is clear, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are well-specified. The presence of foundation documents and specific forms contributes to clarity.
Most essential information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the lack of explicitly detailed technical capability requirements and some unreadable document formats (zip) slightly impacts completeness.
The tender promotes fairness through e-submission, disclosed value, and objective criteria. The focus on background checks for subcontractors is a good practice for reliability.
The use of e-submission and e-procurement enhances practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the reliance on unreadable file formats for some documents could pose minor practical challenges.
Key fields are populated, and the dates provided are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, ensuring good data consistency.
The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but there are no specific social aspects or innovation focus detailed. It is also not indicated as EU funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required