Tenders

Reconstruction of Pärna tee and Ilmatsalu Biogas territory pavement

Open
Deadline
8 days left
March 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306098
Value
€180,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 11, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 10, 2026

Tender Opening

March 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€180,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the procurement is the reconstruction of the road pavement, including the repair of the existing surface, soil strengthening, laying of a new surface, and the arrangement of intersections and the biogas plant territory. The works include the installation of necessary materials, correction of the road profile, asphalt paving, and finishing of verges. The works include all necessary preparation and finishing works, including the transport of machinery and materials. Site plan: https://gis.tartulv.ee/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=77580f126af3444cb2a390768a37853e
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must electronically fill out the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--If submitting a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Business secrets must be declared.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Subcontractors must not have committed criminal offenses and must demonstrate reliability restoration measures if applicable.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must comply with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers.
--Bidders must accept the terms and conditions of the draft contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must adhere to technical specifications for road construction materials, including asphalt types and usage conditions based on traffic load.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a price proposal, as it is the sole evaluation criterion.
--Bidders must fill in unit prices and total costs in the provided cost breakdown.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306098_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract execution phase, requiring them to provide information on criminal convictions and self-cleaning measures.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306098_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.0 KB

This document outlines requirements for bidders regarding the involvement of subcontractors and suppliers related to EU sanctions, the submission of a power of attorney for joint bids, and the declaration of business secrets.

KululoedXLS
Kululoend.xlsx -- 14.2 KB

This document is a cost list outlining individual articles of reconstruction work for Pärna tee and Ilmatsalu Biogas territory, including quantities, where the bidder must enter unit prices and total costs.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306098_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the offer price, given a 100% weight, and explains the methodology for calculating points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306098_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.0 KB

This document is an explanatory guide detailing the conditions and expected response format for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which companies must complete electronically to participate in the tender procedure.

Pärna tee lepinguprojektDOC
Leping_Pärna_tee.doc -- 172.5 KB

This document is a draft contract for the reconstruction of pavements on Pärna road and Ilmatsalu Biogas territory, outlining the terms of the future agreement.

Biogaas lepinguprojektDOC
Lepinguprojekt_biogaasi.doc -- 140.5 KB

This document is the draft contract for the reconstruction of pavements of Pärna road and Ilmatsalu Biogas territory, outlining the terms and legal framework of the future agreement.

AlusdokumentDOC
Pärna_tee_alusdokument.docx -- 32.3 KB

Tender document 'Alusdokument' in .DOCX format (33,123 bytes).

Teetööde kirjeldusDOC
Teetööde kirjeldus.docx -- 46.2 KB

This document describes the technical requirements for road construction materials needed for the reconstruction of Pärna tee and Biogaasi territory pavements, including asphalt types and their usage conditions based on traffic load.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

The tender documentation is generally of good quality, offering clear evaluation criteria and comprehensive information, but lacks explicit sustainability aspects. It provides a solid framework for a competitive procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with legal requirements, utilizing standard procedures, clearly defining the procedure type and CPV codes, and providing a justified explanation for not dividing the tender into parts. The use of ESPD and mandatory exclusion grounds aligns with EU/national regulations.

Clarity80/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable through categorized AI-extracted requirements and document summaries. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as price-only, ensuring high clarity.

Completeness70/100

All basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. While 10 documents are attached, the lack of a summary for the 'Alusdokument' and the unanalyzed ESPD XML file represent minor gaps in full completeness.

Content summary for 'Alusdokument' is missing
ESPD XML file content not analyzed
Fairness85/100

Fairness is high due to the disclosed estimated value, objective and transparent price-only evaluation criteria, and the enablement of e-procurement for equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the e-procurement portal URL is provided. The contract duration is specified, but the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated in the basic information, which could be a minor practical inconvenience.

Specific contract start date not explicitly stated in basic info
Data Consistency90/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent across the timeline and duration specifications.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or an innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (price-only)
Comprehensive documentation provided (10 documents)
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Detailed justification for not dividing the tender
All key tender information (value, deadlines, location) is disclosed

Concerns

Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Content summary for 'Alusdokument' is missing, potentially hiding details
Specific contract start date not explicitly stated in basic information
One document (ESPD XML) not analyzed by AI

Recommendations

1. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents have clear summaries or are fully analyzable.
3. Explicitly state the planned contract start date in the basic tender information for better planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline