Tenders

Design and construction of Parksepa stormwater system

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306097
Value
€16,100
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€16,100
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The public procurement object is the design and construction works for the Parksepa stormwater system in Võru municipality, Võru county, as a general contractor, in accordance with the technical specification and the contracting authority's conditions.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be prepared and submitted according to the instructions in the invitation to tender (HD Pakkumuse kutse Parksepa sademeveesüsteem.docx).
--Bidders must fulfill the conditions for submitting a bid, including submitting the cost in the prescribed form and justifying any business secrets (306097_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The Hankepass must be completed electronically.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per Estonian Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide initial proof of qualification and compliance with tender conditions electronically via the Hankepass.
--Bidders must comply with the stated conditions for submitting a bid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must fulfill the requirements defined in the technical specification (Lisa 2_Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)Parksepa sademeveesüsteem.docx).
--The work area boundaries are defined in TK Lisa2_Töömaa_piir.pdf.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid price must be submitted in the prescribed form (Lisa 1_Maksumuse vorm.xlsx), detailing prices for different design and construction works of the stormwater system.
--The total cost of the works will be the basis for bid evaluation, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306097_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.4 KB

The contracting authority requires compliance with the conditions of conformity for tender submission, including submitting the cost in the prescribed format and justifying any business secrets.

Lisa 1: Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1_Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 14.5 KB

The contracting authority requests the submission of a cost form detailing the prices for various works related to the design and construction of the stormwater system.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306097_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

In the tender "Parksepa rainwater system design and construction", bids are evaluated based on the total cost of works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306097_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.7 KB

The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
HD Pakkumuse kutse Parksepa sademeveesüsteem.... -- 38.5 KB

This document provides instructions for preparing and submitting a bid for the design and construction of the Parksepa stormwater system under a simplified procurement procedure.

HD Lisa 2-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Lisa 2_Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)Parksepa sadem... -- 25.1 KB

This technical specification outlines the requirements for the design and construction of the Parksepa stormwater system, which bidders must fulfill.

TK Lisa 2 Töömaa piirPDF
TK Lisa2_Töömaa_piir.pdf -- 8.0 MB

This document defines the boundaries of the work site for the Parksepa stormwater system design and construction project.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for stormwater system design and construction in Parksepa is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on a simplified procurement procedure.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general public procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type (LM) suggests a simplified process, which is generally acceptable if applied correctly.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are referenced. Requirements for submission and evaluation criteria are documented, although the evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting' without further detail on how this weighting is applied beyond the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Evaluation criteria could be more detailed regarding the 'relative_weighting' beyond price.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and cost forms are attached or referenced. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and the financing condition is a general reference to the contract project.

Contract start date is not explicitly specified.
Financing condition is a general reference.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective, focusing on total cost. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. However, the contract start date is missing, and while financing is mentioned, specific details are not provided beyond a reference to the contract project. The duration is specified in months.

Contract start date is not specified.
Detailed financing information is absent.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is '11', which typically signifies an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded, which often implies adherence to higher sustainability standards.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Well-defined CPV code and location.

Concerns

Absence of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date.
Limited detail on financing conditions.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability objectives (e.g., material choices, waste management) into the technical specifications.
2. Clearly state the contract start date or the conditions for its determination.
3. Provide more detailed information on financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline