Tenders

Replacement of medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva substation

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306073
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 17, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Design, construction, and issuance of as-built documentation for the replacement of Jõgeva station's 10 kV underground cables100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Tender Opening

March 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
72
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Execution of design and construction works for the replacement of 10 kV underground cables at Jõgeva substation. The subject of the procurement is described in more detail in Appendix 1 of the tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

26 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (6)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--The bid must be submitted in Estonian.
--If the bid contains documents in a language other than Estonian, a translation into Estonian must be provided.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-04 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must confirm the absence of grounds for exclusion (using form HD Lisa 5).
--Subcontractors or other supporting entities must confirm the absence of grounds for exclusion (using form HD Lisa 51).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must meet qualification conditions (confirmed via form HD Lisa 5).
--The bidder must comply with international sanctions.
--Subcontractors or other supporting entities must meet qualification conditions (confirmed via form HD Lisa 51).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Perform design and construction works for replacing medium voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station.
--Provide all necessary documentation as part of the works.
--Replace the specific medium voltage underground cables listed in HD Lisa 12, adhering to their names, start/end points, types, and approximate lengths.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a competitive bid price (excluding taxes), as it is the sole evaluation criterion.
--If needed, subcontractors or other supporting entities must financially support the bidder (confirmed via form HD Lisa 51).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

14 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306073_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including confirmations regarding the bid cost, compliance with international sanctions, power of attorney for joint bidders, and declaration of business secrets.

HD Lisa 2 Hankes osalemise avaldusDOC
HD Lisa 2 Hankes osalemise avaldus.docx -- 28.7 KB

This document is an application form for tender participation, requiring the bidder to provide contact details and confirm agreement with the tender terms.

HD Lisa 5 KinnitusedDOC
HD Lisa 5 Kinnitused.docx -- 33.6 KB

This document is a form to be completed by the bidder, containing confirmations regarding the absence of exclusion grounds and compliance with qualification criteria, as well as required data on past projects and the responsible person.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306073_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that the offer's cost (excluding taxes) will be assessed with a 100% weight, awarding the lowest bid the maximum points for the design, construction, and as-built documentation of Jõgeva station's 10 kV underground cable replacement.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306073_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 13.0 KB

This document outlines the grounds for exclusion and qualification conditions for bidders, requiring the submission of confirmations on form HD Annex 5 to prove their absence.

HD Lisa 1.2 Asendatavate kaablite nimekiriXLS
HD Lisa 12 Asendatavate kaablite nimekiri.xls... -- 19.4 KB

This document lists the medium-voltage underground cables to be replaced in the Jõgeva station area, specifying their names, start and end points, types, and approximate lengths.

HD Lisa 1.3 Nõuded teostusdokumentatsioonileXLS
HD Lisa 13 Nõuded teostusdokumentatsioonile.x... -- 20.8 KB

This document specifies the required documentation and protocols that must be submitted for the acceptance of the medium voltage underground cable replacement works at Jõgeva station.

HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 50.1 KB

This document describes the technical scope of the design and construction work for replacing medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station, including design, construction, and required documentation.

HD Lisa 3 Pakkujat esindava isiku volikiriDOC
HD Lisa 3 Pakkujat esindava isiku volikiri.do... -- 25.9 KB

This document is a power of attorney form, authorizing an individual to represent the tenderer in the procurement process, including submitting the bid and signing the contract.

HD Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
HD Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 26.4 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one party to act on behalf of all joint bidders in the procurement process and contract execution.

HD Lisa 5.1 Teise ettevõtja kinnitusedDOC
HD Lisa 51 Teise ettevõtja kinnitused.docx -- 28.2 KB

This document is a confirmation from a subcontractor or another entity, affirming that they have no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure, meet the qualification criteria, and, if necessary, will provide financial support to the tenderer and be jointly responsible for contract performance.

HD Lisa 6.1 Ehituse töövõtulepingu üldtingimusedPDF
HD Lisa 61 Ehituse töövõtulepingu üldtingimus... -- 361.5 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for AS Eesti Raudtee's construction contracts, defining key concepts such as subcontractor, construction site, and warranty period.

HD Lisa 6 Ehituse töövõtulepingu eritingimusedDOC
HD Lisa 6 Ehituse töövõtulepingu eritingimuse... -- 33.7 KB

This document outlines the special conditions for the construction contract for the design and construction works of replacing medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station, including contract parties, object, deadlines, and payment terms.

Pakkumuse kutse dokumentDOC
_LH_Pakkumuse kutse dokument.docx -- 43.9 KB

This document is an invitation to tender for the design and construction works of replacing medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station, outlining general conditions and submission requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

72
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but suffers from significant data inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria and value classification, which could lead to bidder confusion. It incorporates positive sustainability aspects but lacks an innovation focus.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with reasonable deadlines and appropriate CPV codes. However, the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' in the characteristics and 'sole evaluation criterion' (lowest price) in the detailed documents presents a legal ambiguity that could be challenged.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Clarity80/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-referenced to specific annexes. However, the conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria in the main characteristics versus the detailed document creates confusion for potential bidders.

Contradictory evaluation criteria in different sections of the tender information.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and estimated value, is provided. Detailed requirements and criteria are defined across 16 documents. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main overview, and financing details are only referenced.

Contract duration not explicitly stated in the main overview.
Financing details are only referenced to annexes, not directly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair with a disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and electronic submission. The lowest price evaluation criterion is objective, and a clear tie-breaking rule is provided. The initial contradiction in evaluation criteria is a minor fairness concern, but the specific document clarifies it.

Initial contradiction in evaluation criteria (mitigated by specific document).
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration in the main overview, and no direct document URL (though implied by the system), slightly reduces immediate practicality for bidders.

Contract start date and duration not explicitly stated in the main overview.
No direct document URL provided in the basic information.
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a direct contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 150,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'. More significantly, the evaluation criteria are inconsistently described as 'relative_weighting' in characteristics and 'sole evaluation criterion' (lowest price) in the detailed document.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified' status.
Major inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'sole evaluation criterion').
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly includes Green Procurement and Social Criteria, which is a positive aspect. However, there is no specific focus on innovation, and it is not indicated as EU-funded, which often implies higher sustainability standards.

No explicit innovation focus.
Not indicated as EU-funded.

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation with detailed annexes.
Clear technical description and AI-extracted requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Inclusion of Green Procurement and Social Criteria.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Concerns

Significant contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Inconsistency regarding estimated value disclosure ('Value Classified: Yes' despite value being stated).
Contract duration not explicitly stated in the main overview.
Two DWG files not processed by AI (potential accessibility issue for some systems).

Recommendations

1. Correct the metadata regarding evaluation criteria to accurately reflect the lowest price as the sole criterion.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' flag if the value is indeed disclosed.
3. Explicitly state the estimated contract duration in the main tender overview for better transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline