Tenders

Storage and transport of information materials

Open
Deadline
17 days left
March 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306070
Value
€800,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 20, 2026

Tender Opening

March 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€800,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€324,130
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
100 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the storage and transport of information materials. A more detailed technical description is attached (Appendix 1).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidder must meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified by the contracting authority, typically declared via the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306070_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document outlines compliance conditions for the bid, including adherence to EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, the requirement for a power of attorney for joint bidders, and procedures for defining and justifying business secrets.

Lisa 3. Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa_3_Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 11.7 KB

This form is for submitting the tender's cost, requiring the bidder to fill in unit prices for services in euros without VAT, considering different zones and services like storage and destruction.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306070_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that bids will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points according to the provided formula.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306070_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.0 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria, but this PDF itself is not for submission as the ESPD must be completed electronically.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
2026_02_12_nr_1_1.pdf -- 187.1 KB

Tender document 'Juhised pakkujale' in .PDF format (191,545 bytes).

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa_1_Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 144.8 KB

Tender document 'Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldus' in .PDF format (148,292 bytes).

Lisa 2. LepinguprojektDOC
Lisa_2_Lepinguprojekt.docx -- 54.1 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for the storage and transport services of information materials for Tervisekassa, outlining the contract's subject, validity (48 months or up to 800,000 EUR), and parties' obligations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for storage and transport services demonstrates good overall quality with clear, objective evaluation criteria and strong data consistency. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits good legal compliance, clearly defining the procedure type, utilizing appropriate CPV codes, and adhering to mandatory exclusion grounds via ESPD. All deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The tender's description is clear, and the evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as solely cost-based, ensuring transparency. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are provided, contributing to overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, deadlines, and duration, is comprehensively provided. Eight tender documents are attached, ensuring a complete set of information for bidders.

Fairness85/100

Fairness is high due to the disclosed estimated value, objective cost-based evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement for equal access. The decision not to divide the procurement into lots is justified by the need for a single full-service provider.

Practicality65/100

The tender supports electronic submission and specifies a clear contract start date and duration, enhancing practicality. The estimated value is provided, though a specific funding source is not detailed.

Data Consistency90/100

Data consistency is excellent, with all key fields populated, no reported suspensions or disputes, and all dates logically ordered and consistent with the timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender scores moderately low on sustainability as it does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear and objective cost-based evaluation criteria.
Comprehensive basic information and key documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Transparent estimated value and contract duration.
Excellent data consistency and logical timelines.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria.
The decision not to divide the procurement into lots, while justified, might limit competition for smaller providers.
No specific funding source beyond the estimated value is mentioned.

Recommendations

1. Integrate explicit sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders.
2. For future procurements, consider detailing the funding source if applicable.
3. Ensure all tender documents are easily accessible and machine-readable where possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline