Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the open procedure and provides relevant classification codes (CPV, NUTS). While a reveal date is not explicitly stated, the overall structure suggests adherence to standard procurement practices for an open procedure.
Clarity55/100
The service description and technical requirements are well-articulated and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant deficiency, making it unclear how proposals will be assessed and ranked.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness60/100
Most essential information such as title, organization, value, and duration is provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the critical lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of detailed financial requirements.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No specific financial requirements mentioned
Fairness45/100
The tender promotes equal access through a dedicated e-procurement portal and discloses the estimated value. However, the complete absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness of the process, as bidders cannot understand the objective basis for selection.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality70/100
The tender provides clear and detailed instructions for electronic submission via a dedicated portal, including system guidance and contact information. The contract start date and duration are also clearly specified, aiding practical planning.
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and coherent. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions, contributing to a reliable and consistent data set.
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of focus on broader sustainability aspects in the procurement process.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria