Tenders

Tartu City Street Surfacing 2026

Open
Deadline
7 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306007
Value
€163,934
Location
Estonia
Published
February 09, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€163,934
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
81
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The technical specification is provided in the annex to the base documents. List of objects in the base documents and technical specification.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The ESPD must be filled out electronically.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Rules for marking business secrets must be followed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Must meet the exclusion grounds requirements specified in the ESPD.
--Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal convictions or unreliability that would lead to their exclusion during the contract performance stage.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must meet the qualification requirements specified in the ESPD.
--Must comply with EU sanctions when involving subcontractors and suppliers.
--The tenderer must be able to provide information on subcontractors' criminal convictions and reliability during the contract performance stage.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must comply with the technical requirements for street surfacing works in Tartu city.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing the works on the listed street sections according to instructions.
--Works must be carried out in a manner that ensures functional interoperability and compliance with quality and warranty requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted according to the volume table.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306007_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage, requiring the tenderer to provide answers regarding subcontractors' criminal convictions and trustworthiness.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306007_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.7 KB

This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions for bidders, covering adherence to EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, submission of a power of attorney for joint bids, and rules for marking business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306007_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation methodology for the Tartu city street surfacing tender, where the sole criterion is the offer price, accounting for 100% of the score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306007_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the bidder's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission, as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument_pindamised.docx -- 31.2 KB

This document outlines the general framework, legal basis, and scope of the public procurement for Tartu city street paving in 2026, including general requirements for bidders and procurement process principles.

LepinguprojektDOC
Lepinguprojekt_2026.doc -- 183.0 KB

This document presents the draft contract terms for the 2026 street surfacing works in Tartu, outlining the content of the future agreement for bidders.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline_kirjeldus_pindamised_Tartu_-2026.pd... -- 241.0 KB

This document describes the technical requirements and scope of road surfacing works in Tartu city, listing specific street sections and instructions for execution.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

81
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Tartu city street surfacing works is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly in its use of electronic processes and justification for not dividing into lots. While comprehensive in documentation, a minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description and a lack of explicit sustainability considerations are noted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears largely compliant with procurement regulations, featuring reasonable submission timelines, appropriate CPV codes, and a clear justification for not dividing the procurement into lots. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Clarity75/100

The tender's requirements are generally clear and well-documented, with comprehensive AI-extracted requirements. However, there is a minor ambiguity regarding the evaluation criteria, as 'relative_weighting' is stated while Document 4 specifies '100% offer price,' which could cause slight confusion.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% offer price').
Completeness90/100

All essential basic information, financial details, and timelines are provided. A comprehensive set of 9 documents is attached, including technical specifications, draft contract, and evaluation criteria, ensuring bidders have all necessary information.

The AI could not process the XML ESPD and XLS cost list, which limits full content verification, though their presence indicates completeness.
Fairness95/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective evaluation criteria (100% price). The use of e-procurement and a well-reasoned justification for not dividing into lots further enhance transparency and equal access.

Practicality85/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, providing an online opening place. Key practical details like contract duration are clearly specified, facilitating bidder participation.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated, though this is common and usually follows contract signing.
Data Consistency75/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting descriptions of the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. '100% offer price' in Document 4).

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Sustainability20/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.

No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

High transparency, especially regarding the justification for not dividing into lots.
Comprehensive documentation provided, including technical specifications and draft contract.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (100% price).
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline (28 days).

Concerns

Minor inconsistency in the description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% offer price').
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
AI could not process all attached documents (XML, XLS), which limits full content verification.

Recommendations

1. Clarify and ensure consistency in the description of evaluation criteria across all tender documents.
2. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders, even for smaller projects.
3. Ensure all critical documents are provided in AI-readable formats where possible, or provide summaries for non-standard formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline