Tenders

Design and construction of Vastseliina environmental station extension

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305875
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of construction works excluding taxes100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
83
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Improvement of the functionality and usability of the existing Vastseliina environmental station, including design and construction works related to improving the conditions for separate collection of waste types, in accordance with the conditions and requirements set out in the procurement documents and technical specifications of this tender.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 4 categories

Submission (6)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted according to the conditions for submitting bids.
--Costs must be submitted according to the prescribed procedure and using the Cost Form (HD Lisa 1).
--Business secrets must be marked according to the rules.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must be unconditionally accepted.
--The tenderer must fulfill the obligation to inspect the site.
--The tenderer must provide confirmations of compliance with the conditions set out in the procurement documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must meet the technical specifications for the design and construction of the Vastseliina environmental station extension.
--The tenderer must assess the impact of climate hazards on the project and describe mitigation measures, considering forecasts until 2100.
--Any reference in the technical specifications to a standard, source, process, trademark, patent, type, origin, or method of production must be read as "or equivalent".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must accept restrictions on interim payments.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305875_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.9 KB

This document outlines bid submission conditions, including unconditional acceptance of terms, mandatory site inspection, interim payment limitations, cost presentation requirements, and rules for declaring business secrets, requesting bidder confirmations of compliance.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305875_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document outlines that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the total cost of construction works excluding taxes, where the lowest bid receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305875_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 58.4 KB

This document is an informational European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) that explains the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is not to be completed or submitted as part of the tender.

HD Lisa 2-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
HD lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)_Vastseliin... -- 25.8 KB

This document is Appendix 2 of the tender documents, providing the technical description for the design and construction of the Vastseliina environmental station expansion.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
HD Pakkumuse kutse Vastseliina keskkonnajaama... -- 38.4 KB

This document is the Võru Rural Municipality Government's invitation to tender and guide for submitting proposals for the design and construction of the Vastseliina environmental station expansion.

TK Lisa 2 - Kliimaohtude mõju hinnangXLS
TK Lisa 2 - Kliimaohtude mõju hinnang.xlsx -- 34.9 KB

This document is a form requiring the tenderer to assess the impact of climate hazards on the project and describe mitigation measures, considering forecasts up to 2100.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

83
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured and compliant, featuring clear requirements and a commendable focus on environmental sustainability through a mandatory climate hazard assessment. While generally robust, the inability to process all critical attached documents limits a full content verification for this analysis.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance90/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with clearly defined procedure types, appropriate CPV codes, and adherence to EU funding requirements. The inclusion of an 'or equivalent' clause further supports fair competition and compliance with procurement principles.

Clarity85/100

The project description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly articulated. The 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications enhances clarity and reduces ambiguity. Performance conditions are also well-defined.

Completeness70/100

While all basic information, deadlines, and financial details are present, the inability to process crucial attached documents such as the draft contract and cost form (due to file format limitations in this analysis) prevents a full verification of their content. This impacts the completeness score from the perspective of a comprehensive review.

Crucial documents (contract draft, cost form) were not processed, limiting full content verification.
Fairness90/100

The tender exhibits high fairness, with transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), disclosed value, and the 'or equivalent' clause preventing potential tailoring of requirements. E-procurement and electronic submission ensure equal access for bidders.

Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality for bidders. Financing information and contract duration are clearly specified. The lack of an explicit document URL in the provided text is a minor point, as it's typically handled by the e-procurement system.

Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, and dates (reveal, submission, opening) are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating a well-managed tender process.

Sustainability75/100

The tender scores well in sustainability due to the project's nature (environmental station) and the mandatory climate hazard impact assessment, including long-term forecasts until 2100. Its EU funding also suggests higher environmental standards. However, explicit social or innovation criteria are not highlighted.

Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Mandatory climate hazard impact assessment with long-term forecasting (until 2100).
Transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price) and 'or equivalent' clause.
EU funding and E-procurement support.
High data consistency and legal compliance.

Concerns

Crucial documents (contract draft, cost form) were not processed, limiting full content verification.
Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.
Initial vagueness of 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria, though clarified by a separate document.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical documents are provided in machine-readable formats for easier processing and transparency.
2. Consider integrating explicit social and innovation criteria where applicable to enhance sustainability aspects.
3. Consolidate evaluation criteria information to avoid potential initial ambiguity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline