Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login9 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
Tender documents include joint bidder authorization, definition of trade secrets, submission conditions, cost presentation, and confirmation of equivalence, which are necessary for participating in the occupational health service procurement.
The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds and demonstrate at least 36 months of occupational health service provision experience, holding a valid operating license.
The contracting authority seeks an occupational health service provider for employees of Rapla Municipal Government and its subordinate institutions, with service content and volumes to be specified based on risk analyses and orders.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for occupational health services is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a fair evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all tender documents.
The tender adheres to basic legal compliance by providing essential information such as CPV codes, clear procedure types, and a disclosed estimated value. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No immediate disputes or regulatory non-compliance are flagged. The financing condition is clearly stated.
The description of services is clear, outlining the scope of occupational health checks and the target beneficiaries. Key requirements regarding experience and licenses are specified. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as relative weighting, though specific weighting is not detailed.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and financing details. However, the absence of a specific contract start date and the mention of an unsupported file format for risk analyses limit completeness.
The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. Objective criteria, such as lowest price for the primary evaluation, are stated. The decision to not divide the tender into lots is justified by the authority for efficiency, which is a reasonable, albeit potentially limiting, approach.
The tender supports e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. Financing conditions are clearly outlined. However, the contract start date is missing, and a URL for all tender documents is not explicitly provided, impacting overall ease of access.
Key fields like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are well-populated. There are no flags for suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented in relation to each other.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This category scores lower due to the lack of these specific considerations.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required