Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login17 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
8 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, participation application, declaration of business secrets, confirmation regarding international sanctions, and the format for submitting the bid cost.
This document serves as a technical description and offer form for Atlassian licenses and cloud service support, requiring bidders to specify the cost of existing licenses and additional services.
This document is an application form for participation in the procurement procedure, where the bidder confirms acquaintance with and agreement to the terms, their capability to perform the contract, and provides their contact details.
This document outlines that bids for Atlassian licenses and cloud environment support services will be evaluated 100% on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points, specifying the required license types and user counts.
This document explains the requirements and conditions of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which bidders must complete electronically to confirm their qualifications and compliance, outlining the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the expected answer format.
This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the legal and operational terms for providing Atlassian licenses, product support, and cloud environment consultation and migration services for a one-year period.
This document is a personal data processing agreement outlining the authorized processor's obligations and rights when processing personal data on behalf of the controller (Tartu University Hospital) in accordance with GDPR and other data protection laws.
This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one partner to represent others in the submission of the tender.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for Atlassian licenses and cloud migration services is generally well-documented with clear objectives, but suffers from a critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria and limitations in competition due to its single-supplier framework structure.
The tender generally complies with legal requirements, providing reasonable deadlines and using standard procedures. However, the assigned CPV code (7405 - Database services) is too generic for the specific nature of Atlassian licenses and cloud migration services, which could lead to less targeted bidder outreach.
The tender's description and requirements are mostly clear and well-documented through various forms and explanations. However, a significant contradiction exists between the 'relative_weighting' stated in the characteristics and the '100% cost-based' evaluation criteria specified in the AI-extracted requirements and Document 4, which severely impacts clarity.
The tender is highly complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and duration. A comprehensive set of 9 documents, including draft agreements and submission forms, is also provided. The only minor omission is the specific location information beyond the NUTS code.
While document access is full and the value is disclosed, the tender's fairness is significantly impacted by the 'Max Participants: 1' characteristic for a framework agreement 'WITHOUT_REOPENING_COMPETITION'. This establishes a single-supplier framework, inherently limiting competition. Additionally, the vendor-specific nature (Atlassian) and the critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria reduce overall transparency and equal opportunity.
The tender demonstrates good practicality with support for electronic submission and e-procurement. Key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified, and financing information is available. The provision of various forms in required formats also enhances practicality for bidders.
A critical flaw in data consistency is the direct contradiction between the stated 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the procurement characteristics and the '100% cost-based' evaluation method detailed in the AI-extracted requirements and Document 4. This inconsistency is a major concern that could lead to confusion or legal challenges.
The tender completely lacks any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required