← Back to Tenders
Estonia7 days leftOpen

Tartu County, Tartu City, Aardla Street 27b, Connection of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure to the Electricity Grid (LC3048)

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Elektrilevi OÜ

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€27,384

DEADLINE

February 10, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45310000-3

REFERENCE

305742

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hange on välja kuulutatud: Tartumaa, Tartu linn, Aardla tänav 27b, elektriauto laadimistaristu liitumine elektrivõrguga (LC3048). Ehitada vastavalt projektile ja lisatingimustele. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg on 30.04.2026; - Arvesti annab ELV. Teavitada vajadusest kaks nädalat ette. Võimalusel ja vajadusel võib lepingu sõlmida ja tööde teostamise/teenuste tellimisega alustada enne hanke kohta üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega. Hankemenetluse kulgemise pikenemisel üle selle aja võib lepingu sõlmida ja selle täitmisega alustada ka peale üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Confirm the absence of mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Familiarize oneself with the object and projects before submitting a bid.
  • Communicate with the contracting authority.
  • Be responsible for potential damages.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Have completed at least three similar electrical construction contracts in the last 60 months.
  • At least one of the similar contracts must have a value of at least 40,000 EUR.
  • Possess qualified personnel (switcher, C-person) registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements specified.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a confirmation of compliance with the tender conditions.
  • Submit a cost table.
  • Submit signatory's data.
  • Submit a detailed list of previous similar contracts.
  • Submit required documents and photos upon handover of work.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305742_vastavustingimused.pdf9.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines mandatory tender submission conditions, including confirming compliance with terms, submitting a cost table, possessing qualified personnel (switchman, C-person) registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal, and providing signatory details.
DOC
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon
KvalifikatsiooninõudedVarasemate hankelepingute informatsioon....22.3 KB
Summary:
Bidders must have successfully completed at least three similar electrical construction contracts within the last 60 months, with at least one valued at €40,000 or more, and provide a detailed list of these contracts.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305742_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
The tender evaluates offers based on economic advantageousness, where the lowest price is the sole evaluation criterion (with a 100% weighting).
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305742_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...7.1 KB
Summary:
Bidders must confirm the absence of mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds and demonstrate completion of at least three similar electricity construction contracts within the last 60 months.
DOC
LC3048_Hanke lisatingimused
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLC3048_Hanke lisatingimused.docx22.4 KB
Summary:
This document outlines additional conditions for the electric vehicle charging infrastructure connection project, emphasizing reviewing the site and projects before bidding, communication with the client, responsibility for potential damages, and required documentation and photos for work handover.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured for a small procurement, but a critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria and potentially restrictive qualification requirements are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with national small procurement regulations, with a clear procedure type and CPV codes. However, the contradiction regarding evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price) poses a legal risk.

•Evaluation criteria inconsistency (relative weighting vs. lowest price)
Clarity65/100

The project description, requirements, and performance conditions are mostly clear. However, the fundamental contradiction in evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for bidders.

•Contradictory evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price)
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial terms, and timelines, is provided. However, the inability to analyze crucial project and cost documents (zip/xls) by AI means a full assessment of completeness is limited.

•Crucial project and cost documents not analyzed by AI, potential for missing details
Fairness60/100

Electronic submission and disclosed value promote fairness. However, the requirement for personnel registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal and a higher value for similar past contracts (€40k vs tender €27k) could restrict competition.

•Requirement for personnel registered in specific partner portal
•Higher value for similar past contracts than tender value
Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission, provides clear financial terms, and specifies a contract start date and duration, enhancing practicality for bidders.

Data Consistency50/100

While most basic data fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a critical inconsistency between the stated evaluation criteria ("relative_weighting" vs. "lowest price 100%"), which is a significant flaw.

•Contradictory evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price)
Sustainability40/100

Despite being EU-funded, the tender lacks explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to promote broader sustainability objectives.

•Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and basic information
Detailed financial terms and payment conditions
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Performance conditions with links to management system documents
EU funding

Concerns

Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria
Potentially restrictive qualification requirement (partner portal registration)
Higher value for similar past contracts than tender value
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Crucial project documents (zip/xls) not analyzed

Recommendations

1. Clarify and resolve the contradiction in evaluation criteria immediately.
2. Review the necessity and impact of the "partner portal" registration requirement on competition.
3. Consider incorporating explicit green, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
66/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes