Tenders

Development of the South Estonian Garden Produce Value-Added Centre: purchase and installation of inventory

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305737
Value
€35,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 04, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€35,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
78
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€91,816
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
473 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The tenderer aims to equip the South Estonian value-added centre (Kesktänav 29, Obinitsa village, Setomaa municipality, Võru county) with inventory. The quality of the offered inventory and its cost-effectiveness in use must be ensured in the best possible way. The tender is divided into lots.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

2 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (2)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Must meet the qualification conditions set by the contracting authority (including exclusion grounds).
--Must submit a completed European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305737_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 11.0 KB

This document outlines the conditions for tender submission, covering requirements for joint bid power of attorney, confirmation of bid compliance with basic documents, principles of equivalence, and assurance that offered goods are not subject to international sanctions.

HD III Hinnapakkumuse maksumuse tabel_Osa 1-AbivahendidXLS
HD III Hinnapakkumuse maksumuse tabel_Osa 1_ ... -- 13.6 KB

The tender requires a price quotation for auxiliary equipment needed for the South Estonian Horticultural Products Processing Center, including stainless steel tables, pallet trucks, plastic pallets and boxes, shelves, cabinets, scales, and a printer.

HD III Hinnapakkumuse maksumuse tabel_Osa 2-KomposterXLS
HD III Hinnapakkumuse maksumuse tabel_Osa 2_ ... -- 12.2 KB

This document is a price quotation cost table for the purchase and installation of a composter, requiring the bidder to fill in the unit price and VAT fields.

HD III-I Pakkuja inventari loetelu_Osa 1-AbivahendidXLS
HD III-I Pakkuja seadmete loetelu_Osa 1_Abiva... -- 13.2 KB

This document is a bidder-fillable form outlining the inventory requirements for the South Estonian horticultural product processing center, including stainless steel tables, pallet jacks, and plastic pallets/crates, requiring bidders to provide details on the size, lifting capacity, description, and references for their proposed products.

HD III-I Pakkuja inventari loetelu_Osa 1-KomposterXLS
HD III-I Pakkuja seadmete loetelu_Osa 2_Kompo... -- 10.1 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for a composter, including productivity, power, and dimensions, and requires bidders to provide corresponding details of their proposed equipment to demonstrate compliance with the contracting authority's demands.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305737_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.6 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for bids concerning the purchase and installation of inventory for the South Estonian horticultural product valorization center, where the sole evaluation criterion is cost (100% weighting), with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305737_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.1 KB

This document is an explanatory ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) outlining the contracting authority's conditions and requirements for bidder qualification, financial, and technical capacity related to the procurement of inventory for the South Estonian produce processing center.

HDDOC
HD.doc -- 95.5 KB

This document outlines the general terms and requirements for the tender concerning the purchase and installation of food processing machinery for the South Estonian garden produce valorization center.

HD I Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD I Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 55.3 KB

This document is a draft service contract for the procurement and installation of inventory for the development of the South Estonian garden produce valorization center, outlining the terms and conditions between the client and the future contractor.

HD II Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD II Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 35.9 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements, quality, and intended use for the inventory (e.g., stainless steel tables, pallet trucks) needed to furnish the South-Estonian produce processing center, ensuring suitability for production facilities and hygiene standards.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the South Estonian produce processing center demonstrates good clarity and fairness, particularly with its 100% cost-based evaluation. However, the absence of explicit contract duration and sustainability criteria are notable areas for improvement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears to comply well with legal requirements, featuring reasonable submission deadlines, clearly defined procedure types, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and EU funding reference indicates adherence to relevant frameworks.

Clarity85/100

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across various attachments, including detailed technical specifications and explicit evaluation criteria (100% cost). This ensures bidders have a comprehensive understanding of expectations.

Completeness70/100

While essential information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are provided, a significant gap is the missing explicit contract duration. This omission affects the overall completeness of the procurement package for potential bidders.

Missing explicit contract duration
Fairness90/100

Fairness is a strong aspect, with full document access, transparent estimated value, and reasonable preparation time. The 100% cost-based evaluation criterion is highly objective, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, promoting equal access.

Practicality65/100

The tender supports electronic submission and provides financing information, which are practical elements. However, the lack of a specified contract start date and duration reduces practicality for bidders in terms of project planning and resource allocation.

Missing contract start date
Missing explicit contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Data consistency is high, with key fields largely populated and no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and sequential, contributing to a reliable tender overview.

Minor ambiguity with 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value
Sustainability50/100

Despite being EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, the tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and objective 100% cost-based evaluation criteria
Comprehensive documentation with detailed technical specifications
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
EU funding source identified
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Missing explicit contract duration and start date
Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria
Minor ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified' status

Recommendations

1. Specify the exact contract duration and anticipated start date to aid bidder planning.
2. Integrate explicit sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders, especially given EU funding.
3. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status if an estimated value is provided, to avoid potential confusion.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline