Tenders

Design and construction of a lift at Võru Kreutzwaldi School

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305712
Value
€161,290
Location
Estonia
Published
February 02, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Lift Construction Works Cost70%
Design Cost30%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Tender Opening

March 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€161,290
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
81
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority is seeking a tenderer to design and construct the lift at Võru Kreutzwaldi School as a main contractor.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Mark and justify any business secrets within the bid.
--Submit confirmation of compliance with EU sanctions.
--Submit a power of attorney for a joint bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder and subcontractors must not have been convicted in criminal cases involving fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Confirm compliance with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers.
--Submit a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid.
--Meet the qualification criteria described in the tender passport, covering economic and financial standing, and technical and professional capacity.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Design and construct a lift for Võru Kreutzwaldi Kool within a 5-month contract duration.
--Ensure accessibility and compliance with all applicable norms and technical specifications detailed in the "Tehniline kirjeldus – Võru Kreutzwaldi Kooli lift.docx" document.
--Obtain all necessary permits for the design and construction works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a bid that includes separate costs for design and construction works.
--The bid will be evaluated with 30% weight for design cost and 70% weight for lift construction works cost.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305712_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors during the contract performance phase, focusing on criminal convictions such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, and requires the tenderer to provide answers regarding first-tier subcontractors.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305712_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm compliance with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, submit a power of attorney for joint bids, and specify and justify any business secrets within their tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305712_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

Bids will be evaluated with a 30% weight on design costs and a 70% weight on lift construction costs, with the lowest price receiving maximum points for both criteria.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305712_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.7 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions for the Võru Kreutzwaldi School lift design and construction tender, outlining the qualification and exclusion criteria expected from bidders, but it is not for direct submission.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 64.4 KB

This draft document is a construction contract outlining the terms and conditions for the design and construction of an elevator for Võru Kreutzwaldi School, including contractor responsibilities for permits, design stages, timelines, and warranty periods, based on ETÜ 2013 general conditions and specific project amendments.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus – Võru Kreutzwaldi Kooli ... -- 23.9 KB

This document serves as the brief for the design and construction of a lift in Võru Kreutzwaldi School, detailing technical requirements, objectives, and the scope of procurement to ensure accessibility and compliance with current regulations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

81
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of a lift for Võru Kreutzwaldi School is generally well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements. While it excels in completeness, fairness, and data consistency, there are minor areas for improvement in legal compliance regarding CPV specificity and a notable absence of explicit sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

Deadlines are reasonable, and the tender documents refer to EU and national regulations (e.g., ESPD, ETÜ 2013). The main concern is the generality of the CPV code (5867), which could be more specific for lift installation (e.g., 45313100-5), and the lack of explicit definition for procedure type codes (E, A) in the basic information.

CPV code is too general for the specific service.
Procedure type codes (E, A) are not explicitly defined in the basic information.
Clarity80/100

The tender description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are clear and understandable. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and refer to specific documents, aiding bidders in preparing their submissions.

Completeness85/100

The tender includes all essential basic information, deadlines, value, and duration. Nine documents are attached, including technical specifications, a draft contract, and evaluation criteria, providing bidders with all necessary information.

Fairness90/100

The tender value is disclosed, deadlines are sufficient, and evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price for weighted components). E-procurement is supported, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, ensuring equal opportunities.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and documents are accessible via the e-procurement system. The contract duration is clearly specified, although the exact start date is not explicitly stated in the basic information, which is typically detailed in the draft contract.

Exact contract start date not explicitly stated in basic information.
Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, and the data is logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating high data reliability.

Sustainability40/100

Automated checks identified no explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it is an EU-funded tender, specific sustainability criteria are not clearly outlined in the tender documents provided.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social criteria.

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation, including technical specifications, draft contract, and evaluation criteria.
Clear and objective evaluation criteria based on cost (30% design, 70% construction).
Full transparency with estimated value disclosed and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline and detailed requirements for bidders and subcontractors.
EU funded, indicating adherence to broader procurement principles.

Concerns

CPV code could be more specific for lift installation work.
Lack of explicit definition for procedure type codes (E, A) in the basic information.
Absence of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.
AI could not analyze DWG files, which are crucial technical documents.

Recommendations

1. Specify a more precise CPV code for lift installation to improve searchability and targeting of relevant bidders.
2. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability criteria, such as energy efficiency standards for the lift or social clauses.
3. Clearly define the procurement procedure type (e.g., open, restricted, negotiated) in the basic information for enhanced clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline