Tenders

Purchase of badges and decorations

Open
Deadline
28 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305663
Value
€190,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
All badges and decorations based on the technical description (submit the total cost by summing the unit price of each individual badge)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€190,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€112,448
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
182 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is badges and decorations.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The tender is for the purchase of badges and decorations.
--The contracting authority does not divide the public procurement into parts because similar products are purchased and the subject of the procurement contract is optimally realized with one procurement contract.
--The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the entrepreneur's self-declaration, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected answers, but is not a document intended for completion itself.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation.
--If applicable, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender concerns the purchase of badges and decorations.
--Technical specifications for Valgeristi badges in three different classes, including dimensions, materials, and design, are described.
--Technical requirements, ordering conditions, packaging, and delivery requirements for Kaitseliit's badges and decorations are described.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The primary criterion for evaluating offers is the total cost excluding taxes, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit the "Offer Cost Form" (Annex 4), detailing the prices and quantities of decorations and badges.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305663_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

The bidder must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation in the contract execution and submit a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable.

Lisa 4XLS
Lisa 4 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm_Teenete- ja r... -- 17.6 KB

Bidders must submit the "Tender Cost Form" (Appendix 4), detailing prices and quantities for service and insignia badges.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305663_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority Kaitseliit will evaluate bids for the purchase of badges and decorations, with the primary criterion being the total cost excluding taxes, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305663_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for direct completion.

Volikiri_Lisa 2DOC
20251113_A_RHAD_lisa_2_ühispakkujate_volikirj... -- 22.6 KB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to submit a bid for the Kaitseliit public procurement.

RHADDOC
20251208_A_KL_Avatud_hankemenetlusega_riigiha... -- 36.5 KB

This document outlines the procedure for the open procurement process for the purchase of badges and decorations by the Estonian Defence League.

Lisa 3_Lepingu projektDOC
20251208_A_KL_hankelepingu_projekt-asjad.docx -- 35.4 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms, rights, and obligations between the buyer (Kaitseliit) and the seller for the procurement of medals and insignia.

TK_Lisa 1.1XLS
Lisa 1_1_2026_KL_rinna ja teentemärgid_tehnil... -- 45.8 MB

This document details the technical specifications for the Valgerist medals to be procured by the Defence League, including their dimensions, materials, and design across three different classes.

TK_Lisa 1DOC
Lisa 1 TK1202.docx -- 15.8 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements, ordering conditions, and packaging and delivery specifications for the Defence League's badges and decorations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for badges and decorations is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on self-declaration forms.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The exclusion ground related to the Russian Federation is a specific but permissible requirement in the current geopolitical context.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement object is clear. Technical specifications for specific items (Valgeristi badges) are detailed, and general requirements are outlined. The role of the 'Hankepass' as a self-declaration is explained, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications, contract draft, and submission forms are mentioned. However, the 'Hankepass' being a self-declaration and not a document to be completed might lead to confusion if not clearly understood by bidders.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for e-submission and e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The evaluation criterion is based on relative weighting with the lowest price receiving the maximum score, which is objective. The exclusion ground related to the Russian Federation, while specific, is applied universally to all bidders and is justifiable under current circumstances, thus not unfairly tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding the contract start date and specific financing details beyond the estimated value is not explicitly provided in the extracted information, impacting practicality.

Contract start date not explicitly mentioned.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often comes with sustainability requirements.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Strengths

Clear description of procurement object and technical specifications.
E-submission and e-procurement enabled.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Potential confusion regarding the 'Hankepass' self-declaration.
Missing explicit contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation process.
2. Provide clearer guidance or examples for the 'Hankepass' self-declaration to avoid bidder confusion.
3. Specify the intended contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline