Rapla County, Kohila Municipality, Aespa small town, connection of Aruvälja green area detailed planning area (LC4315)

This tender for electrical installation works is generally well-structured for a small procurement, demonstrating good clarity and data consistency. However, the disproportionate reference contract value and the lack of explicit sustainability criteria are notable areas for improvement.

The tender generally complies with national procurement regulations for small procurements, with reasonable deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. The procedure type 'VO' could be more explicitly defined in the main fields, though it is implied by the 'Väikehanke alusdokumendid'.

The tender description is concise and clear, and the AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-documented and understandable. Evaluation criteria based on lowest total cost are also clearly stated.

All basic information, deadlines, value, and location are provided. While all tender documents are attached, the AI's inability to process critical files like the project details, full tender conditions, and cost table means that the content available for a comprehensive analysis is incomplete.

The tender provides full document access (to bidders), discloses the estimated value, and uses objective evaluation criteria. Electronic submission ensures equal access. However, the requirement for a reference contract valued at 40,000 EUR for a 21,000 EUR project is disproportionate and could limit participation from smaller, capable companies.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and detailed financing conditions are clearly provided. However, a direct URL to the specific tender documents is not explicitly listed in the basic information, which could slightly hinder immediate access.

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency, with all key fields populated and no detected disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent. A minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing alongside the explicitly disclosed estimated value.

Despite being identified as EU Funded, the tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as confirmed by automated checks. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.