Estonia, Estonia
€24,308
February 09, 2026 at 11:00
Construction
305652
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Overall, the tender demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, but significant concerns arise from disproportionate qualification requirements and potentially restrictive payment terms, which may limit fair competition. The inability to process key documents also impacts the completeness of the analysis.
The procedure type is clearly defined for the national context, CPV code is appropriate, and no disputes are detected. There is a minor inconsistency with 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the value being disclosed. Payment terms, while legal, can be restrictive for some bidders.
The project description, requirements, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are generally clear and unambiguous. Performance conditions are well-referenced. The detailed payment terms, while clear, add a layer of complexity.
While basic information, deadlines, and location are provided, the inability to process critical .zip and .xls files (project plan, cost table, basic procurement documents) means a significant portion of the tender's content is not available for comprehensive analysis, impacting overall completeness.
The requirement for one previous contract of at least 40,000 EUR for a tender with an estimated value of 24,308 EUR is disproportionate and likely restrictive, potentially tailoring the tender. The 95-day factoring payment option could also disadvantage smaller bidders.
Electronic submission is supported, and key timelines are clear. However, the extended payment terms, particularly the 95-day factoring option, present a significant practical challenge for many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicting the disclosed estimated value.
Despite being EU funded, the tender explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria in its requirements or description, indicating a missed opportunity for integrating sustainability aspects.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes