Tenders

Partial Reconstruction of Valga Station Building

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305645
Value
€600,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 30, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 02, 2026

Tender Opening

March 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€600,000
Duration
10 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
87
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of Valga station building with the aim of primarily improving the energy efficiency of the building. Primarily, the technical systems will be reconstructed. The state of Estonia supports making the building more energy-efficient. Project number: Kliima2.9.01.24-0059.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
--For joint bids, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Declare any business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must not be subject to the exclusion grounds set by the contracting authority, as described in the ESPD.
--First-tier subcontractors must not be subject to exclusion grounds related to criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking; the bidder must provide answers regarding these.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must meet the qualification conditions set by the contracting authority, as described in the ESPD.
--The bidder must accept the terms and conditions of the draft contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be capable of performing the partial reconstruction of the Valga station building, including design and construction work.
--All construction work must comply with Estonian legal acts and standards.
--The scope of work includes the partial reconstruction of the Valga station building as detailed in the technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must include the total cost for the works.
--The bid must include unit prices and sums for all items in the provided cost list.
--The sole evaluation criterion for bids is the cost of the works (100%).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305645_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract performance phase, specifying the grounds for excluding first-tier subcontractors based on criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, and requires the bidder to provide answers regarding these.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305645_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.6 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of bid compliance with tender documents, and the structure for presenting the bid cost.

KululoedXLS
Valga Jaamahoone Jaama pst 12 kululoend 2.xls... -- 28.8 KB

This document is a price table form for submitting the works and costs of the Valga station building partial reconstruction project, where the bidder must fill in unit prices and sums.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305645_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the cost of works (100%), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305645_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.9 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission, as the economic operator submits the ESPD electronically.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt Valga Jaamahoone osaline... -- 31.6 KB

This draft contract outlines the terms for the partial reconstruction of the Valga station building, including the preparation of construction projects and execution of works, based on the tender documents and the successful bid.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus Jaamahoone 2.docx -- 24.7 KB

This document details the scope and technical requirements for the partial reconstruction of the Valga station building, emphasizing compliance with Estonian legal acts and standards.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

87
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the partial reconstruction of Valga station building demonstrates high quality with clear requirements, objective evaluation criteria, and a strong focus on energy efficiency, though it lacks explicit social or innovation aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance90/100

The tender exhibits strong legal compliance with a reasonable submission deadline (32 days), clearly defined open procedure type, appropriate CPV code, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and electronic submission aligns with national and EU procurement regulations.

Clarity90/100

The tender description is clear, outlining the project's purpose and scope. AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and easy to understand, and the evaluation criterion (100% cost) is explicitly and unambiguously stated.

Completeness85/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, and timeline, is provided. A comprehensive set of 10 documents is attached, covering technical specifications, contract draft, and submission forms, ensuring all necessary details are available.

Fairness90/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price wins). Electronic submission ensures equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is fully supported, and the e-procurement portal URL is provided for opening. Financing information from the Estonian state is available, and the contract duration is clearly specified. A minor point is the absence of an explicit contract start date.

Data Consistency95/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and sequential, indicating a well-managed data entry process. The slight formal inconsistency of 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value does not impact transparency.

Sustainability70/100

The tender explicitly focuses on improving the building's energy efficiency, making it a strong example of green procurement. However, it lacks explicit mention of social aspects or innovation focus, which could further enhance its sustainability profile.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% cost).
Strong focus on energy efficiency (green procurement aspect).
Comprehensive documentation and clear requirements.
Full legal compliance and transparent process.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.

Concerns

Lack of explicit social criteria in the tender.
No specific focus on innovation aspects.
Some attached documents (XML/ASICE) were not analyzable by AI, potentially hiding details.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating explicit social responsibility clauses or criteria in future tenders.
2. Explore opportunities to encourage innovation in technical solutions or construction methods.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible and analyzable formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline