Vehicle repair, maintenance, and tire change for Võru Rural Municipality 2026-2029

This tender for vehicle maintenance services demonstrates good data consistency and clarity in its evaluation criteria, but is significantly hampered by a restrictive geographical requirement and the absence of a detailed vehicle list, which could limit competition and hinder accurate bidding.

The tender generally complies with national procurement regulations, utilizing the ESPD. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriate. However, the procedure type 'VO' and 'Type: T' are not universally explicit, potentially causing minor ambiguity for bidders unfamiliar with specific national codes.

The tender description and evaluation criteria are clearly stated, with a transparent weighting for spare parts discount and hourly labor rate. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. However, specific details regarding the 'service point requirements' and the full 'listed vehicle fleet' are not fully summarized, which could lead to questions.

Most basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and key documents are attached. However, a critical omission is the lack of a specific list of vehicles (make, model, quantity) for which services are required. This significantly impacts a bidder's ability to prepare an accurate and competitive offer.

The tender supports e-procurement, discloses value, and uses objective evaluation criteria. However, the geographical restriction requiring a service point within 15 km of Võru municipality building is a significant concern. While practical for the contracting authority, it severely limits the pool of potential bidders and could be seen as disproportionate, thus impacting fair competition.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. While a direct document URL is not explicitly provided (though implied by e-procurement) and the contract start date is not fixed, these are minor points for an otherwise practical tender.

All key fields are populated, dates are logical and consistent, and there are no detected issues, disputes, or suspensions. This indicates a well-structured data entry.

The tender lacks any explicit criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a minimal focus on sustainability.